Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Oral Arguments in Illinois Carry Case (Shepard v. Madigan) [View all]SGMRTDARMY
(599 posts)68. Back atcha buddy
You've done the same thing also. As have I, as have just about all of us. There are very few posters here who haven't done what you are claiming. The one poster that comes to mind is Spin.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Since Heller/McDonald, criminalizing them is going to require a Constitutional amendment
Glaug-Eldare
Jun 2012
#4
Do you think Obama will appoint justices that disagree with his stated position? n/t
TPaine7
Jun 2012
#6
So, is it your position that our president, who took the same path, also devolved?!
TPaine7
Jun 2012
#19
I do hope that you mean to ban ALL GUNS...no military, no police. NO GUNS FOR ANYONE AT ALL
Tuesday Afternoon
Jun 2012
#79
So when you changed from sharesunited, was it evolution, devolution or metamorphosis?
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#40
Obama has evolved on this issue, just like many here and wants to leave the issue alone.
ProgressiveProfessor
Jun 2012
#42
And in McDonald, Stevens cited the absurd Cruikshank decision as his rationale
Glaug-Eldare
Jun 2012
#8
If textual analysis has any validity at all, DUer Loudly is in fact, former DUer sharesunited.
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#71
So what about all the people who saved their lives or the lived of loved ones with guns and ammo?
Atypical Liberal
Jun 2012
#39