Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
29. It's a way to make money at public expense.
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 06:51 PM
Jun 2012

There's not much chance of actually catching the shooter. When the cops get there they'll find a wounded victim or a dead body next to a shell casing. This system will be installed in urban areas where there are already lots of ears. Most of the time somebody will call the cops anyway who will arrived and find the same thing. The only difference is the taxpayers will be paying somebody to do what most people do anyway. It's classic disaster capitalism.

Plus, much like microstamping, it would be incredibly easy to spoof the system for which the taxpayers will also pay. Its a win win for the bloodsuckers who sell and run the system.

I worked for an alarm company in college. False alarms were so bad they started writing tickets for them. Who would get the ticket for these false alarms? It would be a cash cow. And that's not to mention possible abuse of the technology.

"1984" has truly arrived.nt SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #1
Solving crimes, killing privacy Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #2
Not to mention the tying up of resources. Tejas Jun 2012 #7
My city has it, and I got to see it in action on a tour of the police department. Ian David Jun 2012 #3
The days of wires and wiretapping are long over. Life Long Dem Jun 2012 #4
I tell ya marsis Jun 2012 #5
These things can differentiate between firecrakcers and gunshots. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #12
I thought this would be bed-wetting over shooting down satellites with a 50 caliber Glock. Tejas Jun 2012 #6
Why object? Are carriers worried they might get caught after shooting an unarmed teenager? Hoyt Jun 2012 #8
Very *good*, Hoyt! You managed to avoid using the Z-word. friendly_iconoclast Jun 2012 #9
Do you believe there is a right to privacy outside the home? Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #10
Wow SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #11
I have no problem with these kinds of things. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #13
Today, gunshots. Tomorrow, something near and dear to YOU... BiggJawn Jun 2012 #14
No one is talking about fucking Posse Commitatus. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #15
I'd get behind it with certain protections, Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #16
If they can track gunshots, tracking speech can't be far behind. BiggJawn Jun 2012 #18
Think your OnStar is turned off? Tejas Jun 2012 #19
now you just talked me out of gejohnston Jun 2012 #20
WHAT OnStar? BiggJawn Jun 2012 #21
If you are in public, you can be observed, and heard. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #27
Where I'm from, the 4A comes with me. Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #28
There is one difference. rrneck Jun 2012 #22
I fail to see the problem. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #25
It's a way to make money at public expense. rrneck Jun 2012 #29
Even THAT is worthwhile. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #31
And all the false shots. rrneck Jun 2012 #32
There's a study that suggests it's effective Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #33
These devices can discriminate between those kinds of things. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #34
The police using two way radios aren't relaying their messages through a third (profit making) party rrneck Jun 2012 #35
Nothing wrong with contracted services. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #36
Fires aren't gone the minute they're lit. rrneck Jun 2012 #37
So are you against the technology or who is operating it or both? Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #38
I'm against the privatization if pubic services. rrneck Jun 2012 #39
So if the police owned and operated these devices you'd be OK with them? Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #40
I'd feel a lot better about it. rrneck Jun 2012 #41
I cannot think of a more astronomical drain on police resources. NewMoonTherian Jun 2012 #17
What could be a better use of police resources than to respond to GUNFIRE?!?! Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #26
You know, I wasn't looking at it from the right angle. NewMoonTherian Jun 2012 #30
Incredibly misleading headline TupperHappy Jun 2012 #23
Just a thought...maybe Shotspotter, Inc.? Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Shots heard from 2,200 mi...»Reply #29