Gun Control & RKBA

rl6214

(8,142 posts)

134. "Typing on phone with auto-speller sucks also."

Reply to Hoyt (Reply #131)

Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:38 PM

Apr 2012

Gotcha

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

134 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Didn't Trayvon Martin deserve a fair trial too? [View all] DanTex Apr 2012 OP

First things first, who here is an apologist for G. Zimmerman? AH1Apache Apr 2012 #1

LOL! The Gungeon Memory Hole strikes again jpak Apr 2012 #38

What the are you on about now? AH1Apache Apr 2012 #41

Pssssst. He's gotta run to a dictionary to find out what wisdom means, based on his posts shadowrider Apr 2012 #43

That some funny shit there. AH1Apache Apr 2012 #46

Yes that was truly hilarious! What piercing humor! DanTex Apr 2012 #49

You obviously have no fucking clue do you? AH1Apache Apr 2012 #55

No clue about what? DanTex Apr 2012 #76

And Jpak launches utterly unfunny attacks on pro-gun people all the time. shadowrider Apr 2012 #78

I'm not mad. I was just having a laugh. DanTex Apr 2012 #83

Your right and I apologize AH1Apache Apr 2012 #80

"I haven't seen anyone making excuses for Zimmerman" ellisonz Apr 2012 #112

Trayvon also had the right to defend himself...thus the supposed injuries to Z. Frustratedlady Apr 2012 #2

this is not an example of vigilaneism gejohnston Apr 2012 #3

Of course it's vigilanteism. DanTex Apr 2012 #8

Wrong, but thanks for playing shadowrider Apr 2012 #13

Did you read your own definition? DanTex Apr 2012 #18

Dang, your copy button didn't get the entire thing there Dan shadowrider Apr 2012 #22

Do you not understand what the word "as" means? DanTex Apr 2012 #23

I won't argue what the meaning of "as" is. Won't do it shadowrider Apr 2012 #27

OK, I'll explain. DanTex Apr 2012 #28

*Yawn* - For the third time, what crime was Zimmerman avenging? shadowrider Apr 2012 #31

Really, shadowrider? You really don't get it? DanTex Apr 2012 #35

I look at the definition as a whole. You want to split hairs on what individual words mean shadowrider Apr 2012 #40

No he doesn't Phlem Apr 2012 #45

You know about the mentality? AH1Apache Apr 2012 #48

oooh good one! Phlem Apr 2012 #54

you know why your getting these insane arguments? Phlem Apr 2012 #50

Oh look everyone AH1Apache Apr 2012 #63

Pretty crazy, huh? DanTex Apr 2012 #66

you said it I didn't chief. Phlem Apr 2012 #70

Did you not listen to his 911 call? ellisonz Apr 2012 #113

What burglary was Zimmerman avenging? shadowrider Apr 2012 #116

He was avenging the prior break-ins. ellisonz Apr 2012 #121

Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #124

By the way, you need to call the prosecution with your thoughtful insight shadowrider Apr 2012 #125

Sooo..... AzWorker Apr 2012 #77

You might like the word, but he is not a vigilante WinniSkipper Apr 2012 #93

You guys need to quit reading word for word for word while pointing your finger. Hoyt Apr 2012 #95

no, gejohnston Apr 2012 #98

Funny. Clames Apr 2012 #99

911 operators are not police gejohnston Apr 2012 #14

Small point of correction shadowrider Apr 2012 #17

Don't forget the NBPP and their $10k reward for Zimmerman dead or alive. shadowrider Apr 2012 #9

Decried by Martin's family, the BPP, Sharpton and others. But you didn't mention that. freshwest Apr 2012 #12

Wrong, but thanks for playing shadowrider Apr 2012 #15

Did I mention Lee and Barr? Yes, they're assholes for taking advantages. And I could refer to you to freshwest Apr 2012 #67

Hysteria? shadowrider Apr 2012 #71

I know all of that and decried their recklessness on threads at the time. So? freshwest Apr 2012 #75

"so why identify with him? " sylvi Apr 2012 #105

Well said AzWorker Apr 2012 #107

Right, NBPP are a bunch of vigilantes. DanTex Apr 2012 #25

You know what is hilarious about all this... ellisonz Apr 2012 #114

Regardles how massive of a joke they are, they have $10k REAL dollars for shadowrider Apr 2012 #117

Has anyone seen the money? ellisonz Apr 2012 #120

C'mon man. If someone THINKS the money is there, and they see Zimmerman shadowrider Apr 2012 #122

This message was self-deleted by its author ellisonz Apr 2012 #123

Does the fact the 6 members of the so-called New Panthers made a stupid statement change the fact Hoyt Apr 2012 #96

It is not stupid if gejohnston Apr 2012 #97

Nobody is going to take them up on it. And they wouldn't pay anyway because you can't find the 6 Hoyt Apr 2012 #100

since I don't carry, I won't be reaching for much. gejohnston Apr 2012 #101

Yeah, kinda like you guys were calling for ted nugget to be arrested by the SS. rl6214 Apr 2012 #126

I suspect he messed his pants meeting with them without a gun or bow. Hoyt Apr 2012 #129

English translation please rl6214 Apr 2012 #130

Like Zimmerman and many other toters, he's a coward without a gun. Hoyt Apr 2012 #131

"Typing on phone with auto-speller sucks also." rl6214 Apr 2012 #134

Shot in self defense? Phlem Apr 2012 #39

number of guns doesn't matter gejohnston Apr 2012 #44

Sure I have. Phlem Apr 2012 #47

He was never told not to follow Martin. shadowrider Apr 2012 #51

if it wasn't a case of trial by media then gejohnston Apr 2012 #53

Really? Clames Apr 2012 #79

and the rest Phlem Apr 2012 #85

PS. Phlem Apr 2012 #86

So what? Clames Apr 2012 #89

your working on Zimmerman level. Phlem Apr 2012 #106

You should focus on being an adult... Clames Apr 2012 #109

"It takes an adult to responsible with a gun" rl6214 Apr 2012 #127

I don't think anyone is making that argument. Clames Apr 2012 #4

I have read the statutes. DanTex Apr 2012 #6

Obviously you haven't... Clames Apr 2012 #11

Actually I have. Have you? DanTex Apr 2012 #16

I have. Clames Apr 2012 #24

Zimmerman was a "law abiding" CCer. A "sheepdog". DanTex Apr 2012 #33

So to you... Clames Apr 2012 #81

So you think Trayvon "had it coming", huh? Wow! DanTex Apr 2012 #87

Nope. Clames Apr 2012 #91

Who is this "Hoyt" you refer to? TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #36

I've seen my name thrown out there too on a thread in which I'm not participating shadowrider Apr 2012 #42

Dunno. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #102

Well go look in other threads... Clames Apr 2012 #69

You may have read the statutes ... spin Apr 2012 #82

"gun hero mentality" rl6214 Apr 2012 #128

What is the insistence on the part sylvi Apr 2012 #5

Martin was murdered. krispos42 Apr 2012 #7

Exactly. Union Scribe Apr 2012 #104

Some don't believe they'd ever be in Martin's shoes, and are pushing away that terror. freshwest Apr 2012 #10

I've decided. I've decided you're full of it shadowrider Apr 2012 #26

Wow, your name is Dan Tex. I didn't know he had a twin. freshwest Apr 2012 #56

What utter bullshit AH1Apache Apr 2012 #34

Getting a bit riled up about my explaination to Dan Tex, huh? If it doesn't apply to you, forget it. freshwest Apr 2012 #61

Nope not riled up AH1Apache Apr 2012 #65

Your hyperbole over one post shows you to be riled up. freshwest Apr 2012 #72

Correct AH1Apache Apr 2012 #74

This case certainly has a polarizing effect. lacrew Apr 2012 #19

This stopped being about Martin long ago shadowrider Apr 2012 #30

Several hot topics lacrew Apr 2012 #52

Put on your flame suit. shadowrider Apr 2012 #57

The timeline you mention is KEY... AzWorker Apr 2012 #84

See the timeline here shadowrider Apr 2012 #88

Apparently Zimmerman appointed himself judge, jury and executioner. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #20

Martin didn't do anything. He didn't deserve a stop, arrest, trial, OR murder. saras Apr 2012 #20

I'm with you on this AH1Apache Apr 2012 #29

And what crimes was he convicted of that would require he "deserve" to be in jail? shadowrider Apr 2012 #32

Manslaughter at the least nt. eilen Apr 2012 #60

I'm confused shadowrider Apr 2012 #64

I think I misunderstood your question. nt. eilen Apr 2012 #68

He wasn't convicted. His daddy got him off. And you know this already. saras Apr 2012 #111

Not sure if serious pneutin Apr 2012 #115

What I know is, he wasn't convicted of anything shadowrider Apr 2012 #118

Unfortunately, we will never hear Trayvon's side. eilen Apr 2012 #58

The gun was confiscated. nt rrneck Apr 2012 #62

This just shows how people who have decided the case have no clue what's going on shadowrider Apr 2012 #73

Isn't it amazing? sylvi Apr 2012 #92

Who needs to sit on a jury? They make up their minds, facts be damned. Now execute. shadowrider Apr 2012 #94

yup jpak Apr 2012 #59

At issue to my mind rrneck Apr 2012 #37

You spoke my thought sarisataka Apr 2012 #103

I'm thinking... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #90

Sure, but.... AzWorker Apr 2012 #108

The question is this. jeepnstein Apr 2012 #110

How do you know all of this? TPaine7 Apr 2012 #132

Police reports, 911 tapes, Martin's GF's statement about the call. jeepnstein Apr 2012 #133

The problem with giving assailants a fair judge/jury/trial... their victim might be dead by then. OneTenthofOnePercent Apr 2012 #119