Gun Control & RKBA

rrneck

(17,671 posts)

4. Is there evidence the tulsa shooters were attacked? nt

Reply to jpak (Original post)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 04:41 PM

Apr 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

135 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could the Tulsa shooters claim immunity under Oklahoma's Castle Law? [View all] jpak Apr 2012 OP

Castle Doctrine is inside the home gejohnston Apr 2012 #1

Nope - includes cars in OK jpak Apr 2012 #2

It would apply if gejohnston Apr 2012 #3

It's their word against the black vicitims jpak Apr 2012 #5

that is not how it works gejohnston Apr 2012 #8

LOL fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #15

Zimmerman has nothing to do with the castle doctrine gejohnston Apr 2012 #26

But where would you find 12 people with Riftaxe Apr 2012 #14

Uhmmmmm fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #17

Uhmmmmmmm, no, it takes 12 to convict, not one. rl6214 Apr 2012 #29

I think that's his point. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #32

Exactly fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #36

And the pro-gun crowd just smiles, knowing that one of their own will likely not be convicted. Hoyt Apr 2012 #67

Uhmmmmmmmmm fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #125

one for a mistrial gejohnston Apr 2012 #54

Here is part of that law that has nothing to do with your CASTLE Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #119

In Florida the investigation of the Martin shooting is continuing... spin Apr 2012 #25

You are wrong on both counts. one-eyed fat man Apr 2012 #110

Yep and I wasn't even aware that my State had it! teddy51 Apr 2012 #12

Did you read the whole thing? Like section D Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #118

no, just puts the gejohnston Apr 2012 #120

Is there evidence the tulsa shooters were attacked? nt rrneck Apr 2012 #4

there's a lot of evidence they were afeared of the black man. provis99 Apr 2012 #6

The statute quoted in the Op rrneck Apr 2012 #9

Wrong. Straw Man Apr 2012 #81

This is nonsensical flamebait, and an obvious attempt to disrupt the Gun Control & RKBA Group... petronius Apr 2012 #7

Your Sig Line CokeMachine Apr 2012 #10

And still absolutely NOTHING to dispute his claim. fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #18

I'll dispute his claim. Straw Man Apr 2012 #23

Question fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #24

Who? Straw Man Apr 2012 #79

You referenced 'he said, he said' fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #124

Again, who? Straw Man Apr 2012 #127

That a Dead Man Can't Speak fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #130

There were other witnesses. Straw Man Apr 2012 #134

Legitimate question of stupid GOP/NRA/ALEC vigilante laws jpak Apr 2012 #19

So now you've added ALEC to your shtick rl6214 Apr 2012 #31

An Axis of Evil® ? Glassunion Apr 2012 #38

That's all the OP has rl6214 Apr 2012 #30

Were they being attacked before the shootings? ileus Apr 2012 #11

Could jpak claim immunity under ignorance? PavePusher Apr 2012 #13

No foundation fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #16

Actually there are less restriction on the first amendment than the second. Remmah2 Apr 2012 #39

Not True fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #52

Probably wouldn't be a good idea to yell "fire" in a gun store either. Remmah2 Apr 2012 #53

Especially not with the people I see walking around in gun stores. Hoyt Apr 2012 #69

Why do you go to gun stores, Hoyt? Straw Man Apr 2012 #99

Not afraid of folks who can't leave home without a gun. Hoyt Apr 2012 #109

Ha BASS PRO, that explains everything. Remmah2 Apr 2012 #111

Posting to those like Zimmerman who carry routinely will make one like that. Hoyt Apr 2012 #113

I didn't mean the people. Straw Man Apr 2012 #112

Well then, was this an example of a Second Amendment Solution? jpak Apr 2012 #21

Some people should try a 5th amendment solution. Remmah2 Apr 2012 #40

Nah fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #129

No. Feelings have nothing to do with the section you cited? aikoaiko Apr 2012 #20

No. GreenStormCloud Apr 2012 #22

You can't be serious. krispos42 Apr 2012 #27

Only you would think such a thing or ask such a question. rl6214 Apr 2012 #28

"anti-gun zealots"? I haven't noticed too many, if any. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #33

But there are a number here that have embraced the term and admit to being anti-gun zealots rl6214 Apr 2012 #34

So, you carry to protect your family. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #41

Does your family ever leave your sight? rl6214 Apr 2012 #78

Yes Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #90

Neither have I but you never know. rl6214 Apr 2012 #115

"you never know" - So true. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #116

Well I'm glad we agree on "you never know" but rl6214 Apr 2012 #132

I do believe in being prepared. Very much so. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #135

How about naming one or two who embrace the name. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #42

easy gejohnston Apr 2012 #43

oh fer fuck's sake iverglas Apr 2012 #45

I belive I missed that one gejohnston Apr 2012 #50

really iverglas Apr 2012 #55

zealot is different than bigot gejohnston Apr 2012 #56

I'm not a zealot. ellisonz Apr 2012 #46

how does he ST define "pro gun zealot"? gejohnston Apr 2012 #49

What ellisonz said. DanTex Apr 2012 #47

you stay on the list gejohnston Apr 2012 #48

I'm also a "closet gunner". Go figure. DanTex Apr 2012 #59

I only know about you guys gejohnston Apr 2012 #60

So now you're claiming you've never met a single gun nut... Riiiiight... DanTex Apr 2012 #62

define gun nut gejohnston Apr 2012 #65

You don't like labels? Labels like "anti-gun zealot"? DanTex Apr 2012 #68

if you must. gejohnston Apr 2012 #74

One more time... DanTex Apr 2012 #75

the technology does not exist gejohnston Apr 2012 #77

Sorry, you aren't a credible source either. DanTex Apr 2012 #82

So one of your sources is a pro-gun blogger with a clear NRA bias, we can toss him out. DanTex Apr 2012 #76

not really gejohnston Apr 2012 #80

Yes, really. DanTex Apr 2012 #84

I never said she was lying gejohnston Apr 2012 #85

You claimed what she said was "demonstrably false". DanTex Apr 2012 #89

Yeah, about that report gejohnston Apr 2012 #92

Why do I always end up having to do your research for you? DanTex Apr 2012 #87

the aricle does not say that gejohnston Apr 2012 #91

What part of "the materials technology does exist" don't you understand? DanTex Apr 2012 #93

what part of gejohnston Apr 2012 #94

You do understand the difference between DanTex Apr 2012 #95

Yes I do gejohnston Apr 2012 #96

Again, the study literally said "the materials technology exists". DanTex Apr 2012 #97

what facts are those? gejohnston Apr 2012 #100

Evidence please. DanTex Apr 2012 #101

I have not found any evidence that gejohnston Apr 2012 #103

LOL. "I have to go with my version" DanTex Apr 2012 #104

no, she said Glock made the claim gejohnston Apr 2012 #106

Can't prove a negative. Straw Man Apr 2012 #117

A load. Straw Man Apr 2012 #98

Well, at least you recognize that she didn't actually say anything that was incorrect. DanTex Apr 2012 #102

I don't think anyone said it was the wrong thing to do gejohnston Apr 2012 #105

"The overwhelming vote is a no brainer." Simo 1939_1940 Apr 2012 #123

I see you like to play the same games. Straw Man Apr 2012 #114

Here's my take. DanTex Apr 2012 #121

Your take ... Straw Man Apr 2012 #126

Whether you admit it or not... DanTex Apr 2012 #128

Admit what? Straw Man Apr 2012 #131

Spot-on. And why (in this instance) Rachel is even sleazier than a liar. Simo 1939_1940 Apr 2012 #122

"Does any of this sound familiar? " rl6214 Apr 2012 #83

Iverglas wants to ban private ownership of handguns. That is not "gun-friendly". nt hack89 Apr 2012 #133

Proud to be included in the group. Like others, I'm against public toting. I also would like Hoyt Apr 2012 #70

why do you need to buy so many gejohnston Apr 2012 #71

Maybe collectors who don't carry. Don't see many like that around here though. Hoyt Apr 2012 #72

meth cooks are still gejohnston Apr 2012 #73

Yeah but, your side is losing and losing badly rl6214 Apr 2012 #86

I'm anti and a pro, depending on how I feel from day to day. ileus Apr 2012 #51

And there I was thinking you just left out the "sarcasm" thingy Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #64

I'll whine gejohnston Apr 2012 #57

I wouldn't describe you as a zealot Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #63

thanks but gejohnston Apr 2012 #66

out of the nine I listed gejohnston Apr 2012 #61

Proud to make your list. N/T GreenStormCloud Apr 2012 #107

Blatant, mornic flamebait. Callisto32 Apr 2012 #35

aka SSDD nt Remmah2 Apr 2012 #44

Yes, absolutely, they can claim immunity JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2012 #37

Sure. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #58

jpak, you have put a lot of energy into posting ridiculous crap in this forum slackmaster Apr 2012 #88

I suppose. They could also claim innocence under an insanity plea... OneTenthofOnePercent Apr 2012 #108