Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

In reply to the discussion: Why is it so hard... [View all]

spin

(17,493 posts)
47. For some reason many people can't seem to believe that bad things happen in churches ...
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 08:03 PM
Apr 2012

Perhaps they believe God protects churches. However...

Church Security Industry Springs Up Amid Attacks
By William Wan
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 30, 2009


In one hand, he held a Bible. In the other, tucked inside his coat pocket, he gripped a .38 caliber revolver.

He had come to People's Community Baptist Church in Silver Spring looking for his estranged wife. And once she arrived and began arguing with him outside, the Bible would be forgotten. The gun would be raised. And in a matter of seconds, the congregation's sense of sanctuary would be shattered.

What happened that Sunday morning at People's Church was just one in a string of fatal shootings at houses of worship across the country. The most high-profile incidents -- a Kansas abortion doctor gunned down in May, an Illinois pastor shot mid-sermon in March, a Tennessee church attacked during a children's play in 2008 -- have begun to alter the way many churches operate.

Sanctuaries that once left their doors open all day now employ armed guards, off-duty police officers, surveillance cameras and even undercover plainclothes guards who mingle with the congregation.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/29/AR2009092903766.html


While I agree that a person who carries a concealed firearm should have firearms safety training and education in the laws of his state that apply to concealed carry and the use of lethal force, I don't believe that carrying a firearm should require an individual to be an expert shooter. Most encounters which involve legitimate self defense will occur at extremely close range.

Self-Defense Accuracy
1/25/2011

***snip***

In most self-defense situations, an attacker is anywhere from point-blank range out to about 30 feet away. If attacked in your home, you’ll never shoot at a longer distance than the length of your largest room.

In that type of situation, you will not have time to line up your sights, take a deep breath, let half of it out and squeeze the trigger. In many ways, self-defense shooting is similar to shotgunning in that it is “flash shooting.” You lock your eyes on the target as you line up the gun and pull the trigger until you stop the attack.

This type of shooting does not lend itself to pretty groups on paper, but that’s not the point. The point of self-defense shooting is protecting life and limb. All you have to be able to do is consistently hit a 1-foot square representing center-of-mass on a target at a variety of ranges out to about 30 feet. That is self-defense accuracy.
http://www.americanrifleman.org/blogs/self-defense-accuracy/


Expert pistol shooters can shoot small groups at ranges of 25 yards to 50 yards and sometimes well beyond. It would be hard to explain why you had a good reason to fear for your life from an attacker who was 30 feet from you in an urban area.

I do believe that if you carry a concealed firearm it is an excellent idea to practice your shooting skills on a regular basis. While I enjoy target shooting with handguns, I always end my practice with some self defense shooting at close range. Much of such practice involves shooting without using the sights on the firearm which some call "point shooting". I also practice shooting while only holding the weapon with a strong hand and my offhand.

I don't believe that the Second Amendment was designed only to "help people defend themselves from their government."

Second Amendment to the United States Constitution

***snip***

Experience in America prior to the U.S. Constitution

In no particular order, early American settlers viewed the right to arms and/or the right to bear arms and/or state militias as important for one or more of these purposes:[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]

deterring tyrannical government;
repelling invasion;
suppressing insurrection;
facilitating a natural right of self-defense;
participating in law enforcement;
enabling the people to organize a militia system.

Which of these considerations they thought were most important, which of these considerations they were most alarmed about, and the extent to which each of these considerations ultimately found expression in the Second Amendment is disputed. Some of these purposes were explicitly mentioned in early state constitutions; for example, the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776 asserted that, "the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state".[33]

***snip***

Although there is little doubt that the writers of the Second Amendment were heavily influenced by the English Bill of Rights, it is a matter of interpretation as to whether they were intent on preserving the power to regulate arms to the states over the federal government (as the English Parliament had reserved for itself against the monarch) or whether it was intent on creating a new right akin to the right of others written into the Constitution (as the Supreme Court recently decided). Some in the U.S. have preferred the "rights" argument arguing that the English Bill of Rights had granted a right. The need to have arms for self-defence was not really in question. Peoples all around the world since time immemorial had armed themselves for the protection of themselves and others, and as organized nations began to appear these arrangements had been extended to the protection of the state.[23] Without a regular army and police force (which in England was not established until 1829), it had been the duty of certain men to keep watch and ward at night and to confront and capture suspicious persons. Every subject had an obligation to protect the king's peace and assist in the suppression of riots.[24]emphasis added
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution


You have every right to support banning all firearms. Unfortunately unless a wizard appears who has invented a magic spell that will make all firearms disappear, your hope of achieving that goal in our nation at this time or in the year future are extremely slim.
Why is it so hard... [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 OP
because, as a woman, lots of decades on this planet seabeyond Apr 2012 #1
I can relate to both of you gejohnston Apr 2012 #3
I congratulate you. I, personally, have never needed a fire extinguisher. TheWraith Apr 2012 #5
a fire extinguisher is not a gun. just to put it simply seabeyond Apr 2012 #6
must be nice to have a husband who handles all that for you. Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #16
those are choices we make. as i said, i lived a lot of years by myself. seabeyond Apr 2012 #19
that is fine for you. you are a part of a WE but, to deny that YOU have no need for a gun Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #30
wow. lol. so, are you suggesting i insist my hubby get rid of guns or i walk? seabeyond Apr 2012 #33
I really don't give a shit what you and your husband do. Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #43
How dare you tell people how they can come in here. WingDinger Apr 2012 #53
Ya know, you might have had a perfectly valid point... eqfan592 Apr 2012 #102
please see my post #108 to seabeyond in this thread. Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #109
Whining? No, I am settling things like adults. The peer group, is just as important as JURY. WingDinger Apr 2012 #124
well, that is good to know that you think that way. seems a lot around here don't. Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #127
you really have no idea how snarky was your own thought process. I respect you being honest Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #18
omg.... because i have never felt the need for a gun, and expressed why others may feel as i, seabeyond Apr 2012 #20
I am just trying to get you to realize that part of your NOT needing a gun is the fact that Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #32
i do NOT want them. they have NEVER been used. i went over a decade living by myself without them seabeyond Apr 2012 #35
you don't want them and yet you have them in YOUR home. Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #39
Not snark, an analogy. PavePusher Apr 2012 #84
No snark there rl6214 Apr 2012 #86
This is where the conversation gets interesting. ManiacJoe Apr 2012 #10
we play the odds in ALL things. yes, the odds are so very low, that i will continue seabeyond Apr 2012 #14
I am sure you and your husband have reduced your odds for being violated in your home. Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #21
again... you are ignoring the decade and a half that i lived on my own. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #28
when you were young, Yes, I got that and addressed it. Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #34
reno nevada and calif. IF i had chosen to live somewhere seabeyond Apr 2012 #40
yes, I know your mind set Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #42
that is bullshit. i walk tomorrow and i would not have a gun in my house. seabeyond Apr 2012 #44
yes. just forget it. You don't get it and you never will. Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #46
ok. i guess what you are saying is if a woman is married, she does not get to have an opinion seabeyond Apr 2012 #50
Actually, I am trying to articulate a philosophy that has been on my mind for a while now and, Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #108
gosh... and thank you so much tuesday seabeyond Apr 2012 #111
I see what you are saying but, Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #112
i kinda get what you are saying in this post and find it more interesting than the OP seabeyond Apr 2012 #114
I have been trying to make a cohesive statement and a cogent OP for the Feminist group Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #117
the thing I find perplexing gejohnston Apr 2012 #118
my mom grew up in the midwest. spent a lot of time hunting with an uncle seabeyond Apr 2012 #121
and btw.... the 18 yrs we have been married, he has never needed the gun, either. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #29
BUT>>>he HAS ONE or maybe more. does he not? Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #36
I find that interesting Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #13
yes... here in texas seabeyond Apr 2012 #17
EXCELLENT POINT fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #128
re: "he is responsible. it is his to do. i respect that." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #55
I'm about as liberal as it gets... SteveABG Apr 2012 #2
The problem is not everyone can distinguish between movonne Apr 2012 #11
And those who feel they have a problem... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #66
Well there is a good idea. Perhaps only people trained and certified should be permitted to Warren Stupidity Apr 2012 #91
And more broad-brush generalizations... eqfan592 Apr 2012 #100
google shall issue. Warren Stupidity Apr 2012 #104
shall issue gejohnston Apr 2012 #107
re: "Perhaps only people trained and certified should be permitted to carry... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #132
Ideology. rrneck Apr 2012 #4
Still locked into that "emotional anti gun" meme. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #24
yes. the emotional thing on both sides disgusts me. Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #38
Socialism is an economic system rrneck Apr 2012 #45
"The bulk of consumer demand including politics is emotionally driven." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #56
Did I say Socialism? Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #62
Didn't KGO have have gejohnston Apr 2012 #68
Socialism is a socialist ideology. rrneck Apr 2012 #73
Ah, back in one of your foul moods I see Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #103
Petty bullshit always puts me in a foul mood. rrneck Apr 2012 #105
You must only read your own posts Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #106
Why do you think rrneck Apr 2012 #110
Thanks for an excellent question and here is my simple answer. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #120
Nope. rrneck Apr 2012 #123
I don't know why you say "nope", as we agree on most of it. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #125
Disagree on a couple of things gejohnston Apr 2012 #126
I keep saying "nope" because we disagree. rrneck Apr 2012 #129
Not quite sure what you mean by "emotional embroidery" Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #130
The preference you show rrneck Apr 2012 #131
yes Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #25
I agree with seabeyond, that many people can't fathom being in a situation where it's needed. gateley Apr 2012 #7
Pepper spray might work for you or someone like you ... spin Apr 2012 #22
That is a good option (and suggestion). Unfortunately, it's not good enough for most into guns. Hoyt Apr 2012 #27
Your brush is too broad. ManiacJoe Apr 2012 #48
Do you carry that instead of a gun? Any other gun guys wish to speak up? Hoyt Apr 2012 #52
Not instead of, but in addition to. ManiacJoe Apr 2012 #54
^^ Callisto32 Apr 2012 #95
I carry a kimber pepper blaster where my EDC isn't allowed. ileus Apr 2012 #60
I carry both ... spin Apr 2012 #49
Ditto n/t X_Digger Apr 2012 #57
Good post... rl6214 Apr 2012 #87
Really? Callisto32 Apr 2012 #94
That's very thoughtful of you, thanks! I like the idea of a strobe and alarm a LOT! gateley Apr 2012 #74
Absolutely! discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #77
People who practice "situational awareness" ... spin Apr 2012 #80
Yes -- I took a class when I was thinking about getting a gun after this incident, and gateley Apr 2012 #99
That sounds like a very upsetting experience. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #58
I have no problem with people (responsible, non-Zimmerman people) carrying guns. I just gateley Apr 2012 #76
Bravo! discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #79
The very next day I called the police and asked "how do I get a gun, and where can I learn to use it gateley Apr 2012 #98
A bit of a straw man- digonswine Apr 2012 #8
Agreed discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #59
Defense in your own home Politicalboi Apr 2012 #9
I like the way you put it...I agree with everything you said... movonne Apr 2012 #12
Thanks Politicalboi Apr 2012 #15
+A bunch. Hoyt Apr 2012 #26
For some reason many people can't seem to believe that bad things happen in churches ... spin Apr 2012 #47
one point gejohnston Apr 2012 #51
Point taken discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #61
Let's put those restrictions on the LEO's first, eh? Callisto32 Apr 2012 #96
"Unless we have nukes or tanks in our yards, that reason is moot." eqfan592 Apr 2012 #101
Sure it's valid for SD in a small percentage of situations. But why arm millions of citizens on the Hoyt Apr 2012 #23
Yup Politicalboi Apr 2012 #37
re: "I think most who carry are just Zimmermans waiting for the "perfect storm."" discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #63
Most would have said same about Zimmerman before he murdered unarmed teenager. Hoyt Apr 2012 #67
"...you guys never consider..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #69
But, you admit all aren't. Again Zimmy seemed responsible too Hoyt Apr 2012 #70
I can only talk about the folks I know. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #71
The key point is your friends may be the gods of carriers, but all are not. Hoyt Apr 2012 #72
re: "...your friends may be the gods of carriers, but all are not." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #75
Zimmerman being a recent example. Lougher too. Hoyt Apr 2012 #78
I don't think Loughner... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #81
He was legal until he started shooting people in the head. Hoyt Apr 2012 #82
He was permitted to legally make the purchase. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #113
Loughner didn't have a concealed carry license rl6214 Apr 2012 #90
couldn't leave home without a machete or two strapped to your body? rl6214 Apr 2012 #89
All I want to know is... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #115
Pretty broad brush again for your normal, baseless accusations. rl6214 Apr 2012 #88
Data show you are wrong. Callisto32 Apr 2012 #97
Great post. Looks like you're getting some sound replies. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #31
Thanks discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #64
because some believe they're only lethal weapons carried by hidden criminals. ileus Apr 2012 #41
It is truly sad that some feel that way. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #65
I can think of a couple of reasons Kali Apr 2012 #83
re: "being taught to fear guns" discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #116
Because they have no concept of right and wrong and just want to coddle the criminal rl6214 Apr 2012 #85
Damn liberals. Bleeding hearts. Brie and Chardonnay Volvo drivers. Warren Stupidity Apr 2012 #92
I drink Merlot gejohnston Apr 2012 #119
Someone with good taste ;) n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #122
Really? Or you left off the sarcasm tag? Logical Apr 2012 #93
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Why is it so hard...»Reply #47