Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
37. I wouldn't necessarily disagree. The real problem
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 01:22 PM
Mar 2012

seems to occur 1) outside the home (or vehicle) or 2) when the only real reason for using deadly force was in defense of property.

The home owner did the right thing. safeinOhio Mar 2012 #1
This case would appear to be a bit more cut and dry than the Zimmerman case. eqfan592 Mar 2012 #28
I take it you don't much understand conditional probability enki23 Mar 2012 #2
Sure, doesn't it go something like this safeinOhio Mar 2012 #4
So you're saying the problem is corruption with the SPD then? eqfan592 Mar 2012 #30
How about shooting over the intruder's head once? Loudly Mar 2012 #3
The man stated that safeinOhio Mar 2012 #5
Good thing the other guys didn't know that. Loudly Mar 2012 #8
Now there was this fellow... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #14
I would be very worried about someone with one bullet JustABozoOnThisBus Mar 2012 #19
for starters, the same reason you don't shoot guns in the air on New Years gejohnston Mar 2012 #16
So as between shooting to bluff and shooting to kill? Loudly Mar 2012 #25
you missed the point gejohnston Mar 2012 #26
You're shooting to stop, not to kill. eqfan592 Mar 2012 #32
How ethical is it to fire blindly through a wall or ceiling into someone's apartment? hack89 Mar 2012 #33
Yes. NewMoonTherian Mar 2012 #67
Sure he could do that... Clames Mar 2012 #21
Warning shots over someone's head are a bad idea ... spin Mar 2012 #34
You may get an innocent killed that way. discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #41
Very bad idea. GreenStormCloud Mar 2012 #44
It honestly scares me when people suggest that. Union Scribe Mar 2012 #45
There's this t-shirt... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #6
Looks like something some safeinOhio Mar 2012 #7
I suppose you could say that. discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #10
got ya. safeinOhio Mar 2012 #11
You can tell if it's a good day... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #13
Betcha Zimmerman had something similar in his bureau! krispos42 Mar 2012 #31
Ahhh the classic Mozambique drill ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #9
re: "...why didn't you shoot them just once." discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #12
The history of the name is interesting ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #15
Mike Rousseau and the RLI are rather legendary. discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #17
Shoot them just once? BiggJawn Mar 2012 #50
Didn't he know guns kill people? Hidden criminal? pollute socitey? ileus Mar 2012 #18
Under preexisting law there's no duty to COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #20
I know you'd like to believe this... Clames Mar 2012 #22
So? COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #23
depends gejohnston Mar 2012 #27
In the final analysis it always COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #36
Of course the possibility exists... Clames Mar 2012 #29
You're confusing two terms here. COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #35
Not confusing anything. Clames Mar 2012 #39
In other words, "if I think it was O.K. it's O.K." COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #54
You're right... mvccd1000 Mar 2012 #24
I wouldn't necessarily disagree. The real problem COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #37
How is this a problem? Clames Mar 2012 #40
The law does not usually permit the COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #47
I've always found that to be rather altruistic. Clames Mar 2012 #49
It's not altruism. It's our common law, derived from the COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #52
English common law... Clames Mar 2012 #58
so, you approve of the "wild west" gejohnston Mar 2012 #48
I'm sorry, but I really don't understand the COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #53
don't worry gejohnston Mar 2012 #57
"The point-blank blast hurled the intruder backward through the doorway and onto White's driveway." PavePusher Mar 2012 #38
LOL! Glad I wasn't the only one who read that part and thought it was ridiculous. eqfan592 Mar 2012 #42
wasn't blown there by the force of the bullet alone discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #43
Exactly. eqfan592 Mar 2012 #46
Just examining the physics discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #55
I'm going to say your math is way off. AtheistCrusader Mar 2012 #63
His math is fine. Clames Mar 2012 #65
My numbers... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #66
There's a substantial shockwave ... Straw Man Mar 2012 #56
I don't doubt that the man ended up in the street, or driveway. eqfan592 Mar 2012 #59
I think we're in agreement here. Straw Man Mar 2012 #60
Myth Busters proved gunshots do not throw anyone backwards. It was a good show. Logical Mar 2012 #51
They blew the CRAP out of that pig. AtheistCrusader Mar 2012 #64
Well this is complete bullshit nonsense. AtheistCrusader Mar 2012 #61
Very true... spin Mar 2012 #62
I won't start a fight but, I reserve the right to protect myself. Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2012 #68
Seems to me an SKS is a bit overkill (pun intended) for home defense liberaltrucker Apr 2012 #69
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»As long as I can fight ba...»Reply #37