Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Why I'm not going to rejoin the NRA just yet. [View all] friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 OP
They're already in the tank for Rmoney... ellisonz Mar 2012 #1
I wrote them a letter and said they had to find a way to reach out socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #2
It doesn't matter how many letters you write... ellisonz Mar 2012 #3
Change has to begin somewhere... socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #4
Define "gun-friendly" in policy terms. ellisonz Mar 2012 #5
Simply meant as sports people and not anti-gun, that's all socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #7
One doesn't have to be "anti-gun" ellisonz Mar 2012 #8
All they are doing is protecting the second amendment. socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #11
They are not protecting the Second Amendment... ellisonz Mar 2012 #13
You are confused between the NRA and local laws socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #14
Rubbish. ellisonz Mar 2012 #16
Military guns have been collected for generations socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #25
I agree with the Supreme Court of the State of California... ellisonz Mar 2012 #26
An obvious projection - re-read the statement socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #27
Oh I have... ellisonz Mar 2012 #29
You wrote it - not me. It's there for all to see socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #32
The Cali S.C. is a bunch of ignorant political hacks. PavePusher Mar 2012 #34
I'm sure Jan Brewer and company agree with you... ellisonz Mar 2012 #35
Screw Brewer, she's got nothing to do with this. Stay on-topic. n/t PavePusher Mar 2012 #37
You insulted the Supreme Court of my home state... ellisonz Mar 2012 #38
They are ignorant on the technical aspects of firearms, basic math, ballistics, physics and logic. PavePusher Mar 2012 #39
Prove it... ellisonz Mar 2012 #40
So, how many crimes *have* been committed with .50 caliber rifles in California? friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 #52
This isn't a social science argument. ellisonz Mar 2012 #53
That's not answering the question. friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 #56
You're making a really good case for better gun control... ellisonz Mar 2012 #57
Why? Gun crime is on the decline- wait, I forgot... friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 #58
Ironically... ellisonz Mar 2012 #59
When has an enumerated right *ever* been held subordinate to an un-enumerated (and ill-defined) one? friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 #61
"A well-regulated Militia" - No member of SCOTUS denies that gun control is Constitutional... ellisonz Mar 2012 #62
"Legitimate law enforcement efforts" FOLLOW the Constitution. friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 #95
Mahalos. n/t ellisonz Mar 2012 #96
No, that argument can not be made. GreenStormCloud Mar 2012 #64
So you think that gun control has increased over the past 20 years? hack89 Mar 2012 #65
Not in any way, shape or form. PavePusher Mar 2012 #69
No, it's an empirical evidence argument, and you have none. PavePusher Mar 2012 #70
That's not how we make laws in this country. n/t ellisonz Mar 2012 #71
Heh, well played. PavePusher Mar 2012 #80
Mahalos ellisonz Mar 2012 #81
Great. Let's restrict the rights of vocal opponents to President Obama shadowrider Mar 2012 #82
I think you need a reality check. ellisonz Mar 2012 #83
I'm not advocating violence against anyone shadowrider Mar 2012 #84
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution is already restricted. ellisonz Mar 2012 #85
Would you restrict the 1A rights of people based on their political preference? shadowrider Mar 2012 #88
Hell no. ellisonz Mar 2012 #89
Well, my question is a simple one shadowrider Mar 2012 #90
Not all Amendments are identical in construct... ellisonz Mar 2012 #91
You and I disagree shadowrider Mar 2012 #92
Prove what? That crimes commited with .50 cal rifles are essentially non-existant? PavePusher Mar 2012 #68
But what if it was Democrats? Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #6
And you voted for the Republican... ellisonz Mar 2012 #9
It very well could socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #12
I said no such thing... ellisonz Mar 2012 #15
".50 cal rifles for all" Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #18
+1 Simo 1939_1940 Mar 2012 #21
I agree with the Supreme Court of the State of California... ellisonz Mar 2012 #23
California Supreme Court... Clames Mar 2012 #30
I agree with that also. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #45
You also... ellisonz Mar 2012 #46
So does the Obama administration... mvccd1000 Mar 2012 #48
But that's okay- they're authority figures, dontcha know? friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 #51
Lets see here........................... oneshooter Mar 2012 #19
This isn't rocket science. ellisonz Mar 2012 #24
If it ain't rocket science then why do you keep avoiding the questions asked? oneshooter Mar 2012 #36
since MAIG is not a law enforcement agency gejohnston Mar 2012 #42
It is really strange that a person who claims to be so highly educated wants to avoid oneshooter Mar 2012 #43
Cite please. ellisonz Mar 2012 #54
The Tiahart Amendment was passed in 2004 gejohnston Mar 2012 #67
That doesn't prove your argument... ellisonz Mar 2012 #72
yes it does gejohnston Mar 2012 #73
Actually, no it doesn't: ellisonz Mar 2012 #74
since MAIG lied about everything else gejohnston Mar 2012 #75
Now you're getting into... ellisonz Mar 2012 #76
No it did not gejohnston Mar 2012 #77
^^^^ ellisonz Mar 2012 #78
in other words, gejohnston Mar 2012 #79
Poopyhead- you're not recognizing the "higher truth" in MAIG's statements. friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 #94
Yes, I think it is important to send policy messages through voting where possible. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #17
Good luck with that, single-issue voter... ellisonz Mar 2012 #22
If I was a single-issue voter, I would not have voted for Obama. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #44
I think they will always lobby for gun rights socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #10
Democratic* ellisonz Mar 2012 #28
That's because I wrote what I meant - Democrat. socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #31
Oy Vey ellisonz Mar 2012 #33
If all you can do is complain about spelling and whether a word is a noun or a verb rl6214 Mar 2012 #86
You should take that... ellisonz Mar 2012 #87
I understand and agree with your position, but I believe Simo 1939_1940 Mar 2012 #20
No point in donating money to people that piss on the President, while accepting Mitt's AWB. friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 #50
Well said - and I agree with your perceptions Simo 1939_1940 Mar 2012 #93
Obama is not allowing the Korean M-1s to return to this country. GreenStormCloud Mar 2012 #41
True, but Rmoney signed MA's "assault weapons" ban into law. friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 #47
Obama's record as a Senator is profoundly anti-gun. GreenStormCloud Mar 2012 #66
All anti-gun is a level! You do not like obamas level, I do. He as... Logical Mar 2012 #49
"Sorry, but Obama is anti-gun." ellisonz Mar 2012 #55
I can't speak for GSC, but I'm certainly voting Obama in November. friendly_iconoclast Mar 2012 #60
I'm not a single issue voter. GreenStormCloud Mar 2012 #63
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Why I'm not going to rejo...»Reply #92