Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jimmy the one

(2,708 posts)
33. boring bor
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 09:45 AM
Dec 2018

dscntnt: The BoR was required by the People in order to accept the new government because many people were rightly suspicious of a new federal government.

You mean mainly the writers of the constitution & political figures, since approx 98% of americans could not even vote, nor did vote for geo washington even.

dscntnt: You are wrong in that The People were not given any rights by the Bill of Rights. The BoR doesn't create or bestow a right.

The bill of rights was both a restriction on congress & a guarantee of individual rights (in 2nA case, the right to belong to a well regulated militia, right as a duty, as per the 1688 british have arms decree):

encyclopedia britannica: Bill of Rights, in the United States, the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which were adopted as a single unit on Dec 15, 1791, and which constitute a collection of mutually reinforcing guarantees of individual rights and of limitations on federal and state governments. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/503541/Bill-of-Rights

wiki: The Bill of Rights is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. Proposed to assuage the fears of Anti-Federalists who had opposed Constitutional ratification, these amendments guarantee a number of personal freedoms, limit the government's power in judicial and other proceedings, and reserve some powers to the states and the public. http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172167980

Wm Rawle, 1829, A view of the constitution, all caps in link, some not my emphasis: CHAPTER X. OF THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE POWERS OF CONGRESS — AND ON THE EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES — RESTRICTIONS ON THE POWERS OF STATES AND SECURITY TO THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS
Of the amendments already adopted, the eight first in order fall within the class of restrictions on the legislative power, some of which would have been implied, some are original, and all are highly valuable. Some are also to be considered as restrictions on the judicial power.
The constitutions of some of the states contain bills of rights; others do not. A declaration of rights, therefore, properly finds a place in the general Constitution, where it equalizes all and binds all
. http://www.constitution.org/wr/rawle_10.htm

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2018 #1
That's an odd question. My take is that gun nuts interpret the meaning of the amendment differently Nitram Nov 2018 #2
The "implications" of the well regulated militia clause needledriver Nov 2018 #3
That's your idiosyncratic interpretation. There are two interpretations that are widely accepted Nitram Nov 2018 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author gejohnston Nov 2018 #5
A simple challenge for you hack89 Nov 2018 #6
I make a distinction between owning and practicing the safe use of a firearm, Nitram Nov 2018 #7
We are talking about guns and the militia. hack89 Nov 2018 #8
The history around the Bill of Rights supports my claim. During debates on what rights should be Nitram Nov 2018 #10
Ok. Now show me the case law that says all of that. hack89 Nov 2018 #11
You can start here. Enjoy! Nitram Nov 2018 #15
No. hack89 Nov 2018 #18
"But with the right of gun ownership enshrined in the U.S. Constitution" hack89 Nov 2018 #19
anywhere outside of the South before the mid 1920s gejohnston Nov 2018 #9
Per your request, yagotme Nov 2018 #12
In south central Kansas, some 55 years ago. oneshooter Nov 2018 #13
You've just proved my point. You were not allowed to "bear arms" in school. Nitram Nov 2018 #16
Ok, so you agree that a 10yr old should be allowed to carry a rifle oneshooter Nov 2018 #22
I was given my first rifle at age 10. I would never have been allowed to carry it loaded, not to Nitram Nov 2018 #23
And how long ago was this? oneshooter Nov 2018 #24
1962 Nitram Nov 2018 #25
Were you living in a city/town? oneshooter Nov 2018 #26
Rural Virginia. Nitram Nov 2018 #27
I took my first "big game" with my Grandfathers M92 in 38WCF, no scope. I was 10 years old. oneshooter Nov 2018 #28
Umm, your original question was to "Carry" "into school". yagotme Dec 2018 #30
You do realize that schools used to have gun clubs, don't you? Revanchist Nov 2018 #14
Looks pretty well-regulated to me. Nitram Nov 2018 #17
Poor trigger discipline in some of those pics. yagotme Dec 2018 #31
But nothing to do with the militia, right? Nt hack89 Nov 2018 #29
My daughter's university in Minnasota has secure gun lockers for students hack89 Nov 2018 #21
Yes, there are two interpretations discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2018 #20
boring bor jimmy the one Dec 2018 #33
Apologies for the quote. It should heave been, "Jimmy, we have to cook." discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2018 #34
both limitation and protection in bor jimmy the one Dec 2018 #36
"...you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it comprehend..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2018 #37
I'm so excited, I just can't hide it jimmy the one Dec 2018 #38
re: "Thanks for making my point." discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2018 #39
miller said no individual rkba jimmy the one Dec 2018 #40
re: "miller said no individual rkba" discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2018 #41
read and understand 1939 miller decision jimmy the one Dec 2018 #42
re: "Abandonment by defense counsel occurs & occurred... You make little sense." discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2018 #43
1939 Miller decision in supreme court jimmy the one Dec 2018 #32
In discussing miller provide for us in detail... discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2018 #35
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Which Americans support t...»Reply #33