Gun Control & RKBA

beevul

(12,194 posts)

59. WRONG.

Thu May 5, 2016, 03:16 PM

May 2016

You label folks who run for their lives as "thieves".

WRONG. Nobody is "running for their lives" from a holstered weapon. They're "running because of their delicate sensibilities".

Delicate flowers, those.

That sort of ammosexual internet lawyering is intended to intimidate folks into just sitting there meekly and risking their lives in the face of a deadly threat.

The "deadly threat" of a holstered weapon. How many times have you run from police, seeing as they have the same "holstered weapon"?

Did the judge buy your explanation of "deadly threat" about the officers sidearm?

It is also intended as a coded green light for other unstable ammosexuals to shoot folks who run for their lives.

Some time I would like to visit your world and take pictures of the sky, as long as I can get back to this one afterwards.

I wouldn't want to be stuck in backwardsville permanently.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

98 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why do ammosexuals call people "thieves"? What's in it for them? [View all] stone space May 2016 OP

If you are going to use... Puha Ekapi May 2016 #1

Define "thief". Is anybody who runs from an ammosexual a thief? (nt) stone space May 2016 #2

I'm not the one throwing undefined terms around. Puha Ekapi May 2016 #4

A thief Duckhunter935 May 2016 #5

What if the person is simply running away from an armed ammosexal in a resturant? stone space May 2016 #8

he/she's being paranoid? ileus May 2016 #14

But does running away from an ammosexual make one a "thief"? stone space May 2016 #17

I'd suppose the ammosexual has the same natural rights as anyone else? ileus May 2016 #19

Yes, if one hasn't paid for one's food. Straw Man May 2016 #25

No, its the faliure to pay the bill that makes one a thief. beevul May 2016 #30

Why are you trying to bully people into risking their lives? stone space May 2016 #44

Why are you accusing me of something I'm not doing? beevul May 2016 #52

Labeling us as thieves for running away is a form of bullying. (nt) stone space May 2016 #55

Running w/o paying, from an eatery where no danger is present, is a form of thieving N/T beevul May 2016 #62

She murdered two people. How many times do I have to say it before you understand? stone space May 2016 #63

Did someone say she didn't? beevul May 2016 #65

The difference: One of them is paranoid, the other is having lunch DonP May 2016 #23

Doubt that TeddyR May 2016 #24

Irrational fear Duckhunter935 May 2016 #29

Please cease using allusions to bigoted expressions. Eleanors38 May 2016 #41

No allusions here. I call ammosexuals "ammosexuals" quote openly. stone space May 2016 #71

Would you prefer to be called a "hoplaphobe"? n/t oneshooter May 2016 #76

That's a made-up word. stone space May 2016 #77

LOL...thread winner reply. ileus May 2016 #79

As opposed to "Ammosexuals" which is from what, Shakespeare? DonP May 2016 #80

Well done... beevul May 2016 #83

I know Duckhunter935 May 2016 #86

Like ammosexual Duckhunter935 May 2016 #85

Maybe they mean oxygen theif... scscholar May 2016 #34

Doesn't look like her handling was so bad-she clearly shot in the air. That said, jmg257 May 2016 #3

She didn't have a CCL, and has been charged a felony for that shot. braddy May 2016 #28

Good Press Virginia May 2016 #36

I agree, she is the wrong type for carry, and this will probably prevent her from doing so again. braddy May 2016 #37

Damn guns are burning holes in their pockets Warpy May 2016 #6

ifyouonly....LOL ileus May 2016 #7

Ammosexuals find it funny when their fellow ammosexuals shoot at people. stone space May 2016 #12

those hateful bastards! ileus May 2016 #13

Ammosexuals also like to label people who run away from them as "thieves". stone space May 2016 #15

So I've read....I have no answers, may they rot in hell. ileus May 2016 #18

Ammophobes also like to label people as ammosexuals, as they're running for the door. beevul May 2016 #32

Can anti's write.... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #9

Well, OP's do tend to get censored here in the gungeon, so why bother writing poetry? stone space May 2016 #10

"I have not been censored. CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #11

Just don't mention John Lennon. stone space May 2016 #72

Read the Group ToS and try again with something relevant DonP May 2016 #73

FAIL. It was posted on the aniversary of his assassination. stone space May 2016 #74

Don't care if it was the frickin 4th of July, not relevant in any way to the ToS of this group DonP May 2016 #75

It was not censored Duckhunter935 May 2016 #87

Only when they are irrelevant or obviously violate the ToS here DonP May 2016 #16

No they do not Duckhunter935 May 2016 #33

LOL. beevul May 2016 #84

I expect he will not answer Duckhunter935 May 2016 #94

Thank you for all you do to damage the gun control effort Lurks Often May 2016 #20

Good news, the "thief"* in this case went to jail, and the alleged "ammosexual" was indicted jmg257 May 2016 #21

Here ay DU, the ammosexuals consider anybody who runs from guns in a resturant a "thief". stone space May 2016 #31

Here in America, the law considers anyone that doesn't pay their bill, a thief. beevul May 2016 #35

You can't intimidate us into risking our lives for you. stone space May 2016 #38

Its a good thing I never tried to then, huh? beevul May 2016 #40

Not society in general. Just ammosexual internet lawyers. stone space May 2016 #43

Nope. The law. beevul May 2016 #45

She murdered two people. Why should we allow ourselves to be murdered for you? (nt) stone space May 2016 #47

Remind me where I said you should, genius. beevul May 2016 #50

You label folks who run for their lives as "thieves". stone space May 2016 #54

WRONG. beevul May 2016 #59

Interesting. Straw Man May 2016 #56

Why do we have to assume that she loves us more than she loves her own family? stone space May 2016 #57

Obviously you know nothing about domestic violence. Straw Man May 2016 #60

That picture really upsets me.... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #46

One of them murdered two people. (nt) stone space May 2016 #48

Link? CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #49

Link here: stone space May 2016 #51

In other words ... Straw Man May 2016 #58

"It's a magazine, not a clip!" stone space May 2016 #61

Right from the manual. beevul May 2016 #64

Missed the point by a mile, as usual. Straw Man May 2016 #96

I'm running. (nt) stone space May 2016 #97

From whom? Straw Man May 2016 #98

Ah - gotcha. Yes - bringing an AR into a restaurant - on a date or otherwise, jmg257 May 2016 #39

Let's get this straight ... Straw Man May 2016 #42

Why do thieves pretend stealing food is about safety? What in it for them (besides free food)? Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #22

This question is too logical TeddyR May 2016 #88

Yes he tends to do that Duckhunter935 May 2016 #95

Was she using geometry and the rotation of the earth to kill him by Press Virginia May 2016 #26

The woman did not have a CCL and was charged with "deadly conduct" for discharging into the air. braddy May 2016 #27

Just for the record.... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #53

Also.... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #66

No. stone space May 2016 #67

What do sex and gun ownership have to do with one another...? CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #68

Not much unless you go out on dinner dates with your gun. stone space May 2016 #69

I don't date my gun, no. CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #70

Some people just have problems Duckhunter935 May 2016 #89

Reminds me of watching too much... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #93

He simply wants to toss insults TeddyR May 2016 #91

Should anyone be allowed to call a thief a thief? ileus May 2016 #78

Whereas... Puha Ekapi May 2016 #81

"What's in it for them?" beevul May 2016 #82

Yep, the truth hurts, I guess Duckhunter935 May 2016 #90

Wait! TeddyR May 2016 #92