Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
4. That is a poll. Reality, on the other hand, shows gun laws loosening a pols being recalled despite
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 08:14 AM
Apr 2015

Bloomberg's bank rolling.

Why would it cost them the election? Scuba Apr 2015 #1
Yes, but when was the last time a Republican controlled Congress card about what the people wanted? leftofcool Apr 2015 #3
That is a poll. Reality, on the other hand, shows gun laws loosening a pols being recalled despite Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #4
If gun control started and ended with UBCs, you might have a point hack89 Apr 2015 #8
I think I will go with C. leftofcool Apr 2015 #2
False dichotomy mwrguy Apr 2015 #5
That would be choice D Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #6
Ann Richards views on CCW probably cost her the 1994 Governor's election Lurks Often Apr 2015 #7
Would you want a Democratic candidate to be anti-gun if it would win them the election? safeinOhio Apr 2015 #9
It's a good question but I would say "no" Shamash Apr 2015 #10
or, would you want a Democratic candidate that safeinOhio Apr 2015 #13
I don't see firearm rights as being more or less important than other rights Shamash Apr 2015 #14
Sounds reasonable if someone is trying to kill me. safeinOhio Apr 2015 #15
No disagreement there. Zimmerman should be in jail. n/t Shamash Apr 2015 #16
Only because of fear for his life laws safeinOhio Apr 2015 #17
? gejohnston Apr 2015 #18
B or D I suppose. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #11
8 years ago it was gay marriage that folks wanted Democrats to run away from. stone space Apr 2015 #12
"Democrats should just do what is right." NaturalHigh Apr 2015 #22
Guns do not have rights. Guns and corporations are not people (nt) stone space Apr 2015 #23
Still displaying your lack of knowledge on the subject? Lurks Often Apr 2015 #24
I have made no comments about any political or governmental document. stone space Apr 2015 #25
So you acknowledge owning a firearm is a civil right Lurks Often Apr 2015 #26
This is a personal attack based on pure anti-intellectualism, plain and simple. stone space Apr 2015 #27
Yet again you fail to answer a simple question Lurks Often Apr 2015 #28
No, I most certainly do not. stone space Apr 2015 #29
Expecting professors with Master's and Doctorates to understand Lurks Often Apr 2015 #30
You can expect anything you want, but claiming that... stone space Apr 2015 #31
Yes, I have LOTS and LOTS of posts bashing professors at a public university Lurks Often Apr 2015 #32
Then why did you bring up my employment and use it to bash me? stone space Apr 2015 #33
You seem a little obsessive about taking everything personally Lurks Often Apr 2015 #34
I understand that it is not about me. stone space Apr 2015 #35
Again with making things up and jumping to wild conclusions Lurks Often Apr 2015 #36
You admitted yourself that it wasn't about me. (nt) stone space Apr 2015 #37
I don't want any of our candidates pro-control...they should all be 2A progressives. ileus Apr 2015 #19
^^ This. NT pablo_marmol Apr 2015 #20
E NaturalHigh Apr 2015 #21
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Would you want the Dem ca...»Reply #4