Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)

32. 4473 is for the purchase of a gun.

Reply to anomiep (Reply #31)

Wed Jul 17, 2013, 07:40 PM

Jul 2013

If that form is used in connection with CPL applications, it's not done so in my state. Possible I guess.

No felon would pass the background check for a CPL, that's what the fingerprints are for.

"would seem to imply that nobody could ever be charged with perjury for signing that their statement was true and correct on an affidavit where they'd lied."

That is precisely why so many of us hold the court decision in that particular case to be ridiculous.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gun-rights activist Adam Kokesh arrested in Herndon [View all] rdharma Jul 2013 OP

good, enforce existing laws Duckhunter935 Jul 2013 #1

But he'll get out of prison........ rdharma Jul 2013 #2

Nah, he's toast if convicted ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #4

No more guns? rdharma Jul 2013 #5

Not legally ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #8

Illegally yes. AtheistCrusader Jul 2013 #20

If he's convicted. rl6214 Jul 2013 #16

The guy was a nutcase anyway ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #3

A nutcase? rdharma Jul 2013 #6

I agree ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #7

He wasn't advocating banning guns...... rdharma Jul 2013 #9

He wasn't referencing Adam Kokesh..... premium Jul 2013 #12

LOL! Eleanors38 Jul 2013 #10

LOL. premium Jul 2013 #11

Another "responsible firearms owner" gone bad rdharma Jul 2013 #13

There's no evidence whatsoever that he was a "responsible firearms owner" friendly_iconoclast Jul 2013 #14

He could legally own a gun.......... right? rdharma Jul 2013 #15

There's a difference between 'legal' and 'responsible', and there's a way to understand... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2013 #17

Explain the 'difference' ....... rdharma Jul 2013 #18

It's like the First Amendment ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #23

Nothing in the Constitution requires people to be "responsible" rdharma Jul 2013 #24

LOL, still not getting the lesson I see ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #25

"Responsible also does not equal illegal." rdharma Jul 2013 #26

Very good ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #27

Let me know when you realize that rights under the Constitution are not unlimited! nt rdharma Jul 2013 #28

actually, maybe not gejohnston Jul 2013 #19

I'm surprised that hasn't been challenged in court yet. AtheistCrusader Jul 2013 #21

??? anomiep Jul 2013 #29

Haynes vs. U.S. (1968) AtheistCrusader Jul 2013 #30

A person who fills out a license form or a 4473 anomiep Jul 2013 #31

4473 is for the purchase of a gun. AtheistCrusader Jul 2013 #32

I referenced 4473 anomiep Jul 2013 #33

Libertarians and their love of drugs... ileus Jul 2013 #22