Credibility Poll

[clffrdjk]

25. Where was it claimed to be anything but an unscientific internal poll?

The fact that you and I agree on this point should show you just how obvious and unnecessary it is to point out that this poll is unscientific and internal only.

"Right so you understand why we think gunnuts as rightwing loonies inept at thinking beyond their personal gun ownership & trumped up rights thereof."

Let's try to keep the name calling to a minimum yes I started it, I apologize

"The federal assault rifle ban was defeated 40-60 in the senate last month, the legislation is not really under consideration. The only recent assault weapons bans (under consideration) which passed were in new york & denver colorado & apparently are being appealed by gun lobbynuts, and then 'credibility poll' is asking whether 'another assault weapons ban' is really necessary, duh, why should I default into thinking she's referring to the feds rather than the state appeals?"

I guess I don't understand why you consider laws that passed prior to this latest attempt more relevant than the latest attempt? Or why when no state is mentioned you would automatically assume that the question refers to a particular state and not the more inclusive federal movement?

"I'm blabbing on about nothing? when you yourself in the very post agreed with my premise?"

Yes, once again no one has argued that this is anything but an unscientific internal poll yet you felt the need to type up a paragraph or two tearing it down. I don't think anyone is dumb enough to try and use this to show the feelings of the public as a whole