HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Justice & Public Safety » Civil Liberties (Group) » Strict Constructionists a... » Reply #6

Response to bucolic_frolic (Original post)

Sun Jan 6, 2013, 07:02 PM

6. It is POSSIBLE (though probably really pushing it) to come to such a conclusion

It is not the most likely interpretation which is exactly which time frame of weapon is not at issue (I honestly don't see how such is even inferred any more than free press not applying to TV and radio) but establishment of the guarantee of a principle.

I also see an acceptance of a level of parity with even the military, if such was issue division would already be set.
At the time, folks might very well come to to serve with a better weapon than was ever going to be issued to them.
Hell, even very recently I know some cops bought their own semi-autos and only more recently got the option or were just issued semi-autos.

The debate if commoners should be allowed to be armed is ancient, the argument of scale to a soldier or policeman is pretty new and not really supported by reality until really the machine gun "ban" in response to gangs motivated by prohibition. A solution to a problem that otherwise wouldn't exist.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 16 replies Author Time Post
bucolic_frolic Dec 2012 OP
Hoyt Dec 2012 #1
echo216610 Dec 2012 #3
Hoyt Dec 2012 #5
antigop19667 Jan 2013 #12
immoderate Dec 2012 #2
echo216610 Dec 2012 #4
LineReply It is POSSIBLE (though probably really pushing it) to come to such a conclusion
TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #6
cmclane28 Jan 2013 #7
CJCRANE Jan 2013 #8
Name removed May 2013 #16
virginia mountainman Jan 2013 #9
bobclark86 Jan 2013 #10
ebayisajoke Jan 2013 #11
Lone --- Wolf Mar 2013 #13
In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #14
sallyjojo Mar 2013 #15
Please login to view edit histories.