Here's a correction OP for 50 Reasons, 50 Years OP

[arguille]

100. reply to #99

Wm Seger - are you noticing that the bubble that surrounds you is getting smaller and smaller with every post you submit?

The deceptive diagram you posted has been floating around for years so it is intriguing to hear your claims that you are the author. The diagram purports to establish an anatomical geometry from which a trajectory angle is produced - except the basic premise of comparison is fraudulent in the first place. Oh wait - it's only an "approximation" with no "accuracy", because "accuracy" is not required because it is only meant to show that something is "possible" when the premise is rigged to begin with. Good one.

re: Victoria Adams

The Warren Commission, in the guise of staff lawyer David Belin, engaged in all the technical cartwheels you've been spinning, and could not resolve their central problem: they could not get their man down the stairs to the 2nd floor. So they decided to change their witness' story, over her objections, inserting words she did not say into the record, and hiding crucial information that establishes their dishonesty in this matter from public view.

Since you are now assuming a weary tone after your arguments have consistently shown to be wanting, I will briefly review some of your "credible evidence":

a) a deceptive 2-frame GIF which purports to explain body movement which occurs in the immediate following frames which are not included

b) a deceptive photograph of two bullets by which a comparison is attempted, even as the author can provide no details as to the accuracy of his experiment and the author admits the experiment was engaged with the results already determined.
The author also uses an arrow to make a claim the author knows, or should know, to be false.

c) a deceptive anatomical comparison diagram which claims to establish a point of reference even as the different size and differing positions of the body establish that any alleged point of reference is a fantasy.

I really don't have a problem with someone trying to argue these points or ginning up all the deceptive "credible evidence" they wish - hey, we all need a hobby - but what I don't understand is why you feel the need to be so dismissive and arrogant as you do so.