Creative Speculation

Ohio Joe

(21,753 posts)

7. Giving it a quick look over...

Thu Jan 12, 2012, 05:25 PM

Jan 2012

The reports released seem to pretty much cover what they should. Analysis and conclsion should be done by the body investigating (in this case, the FBI). With the data supplied, I do not see much doubt as to the conclusion that would be reached if the NTSB had done that part themselves.

I don't know... I'm not certain what the OP is looking for, perhaps s/he will return with some more specifcs. Thanks!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] antitsa Jan 2012 OP

I read this and had to think for a minute... Ohio Joe Jan 2012 #1

There were no NTSB crash reports for the 9/11 flights SlipperySlope Jan 2012 #2

The reports look pretty comprehensive to me Ohio Joe Jan 2012 #4

I didn't speculate about whether it was "reasonable", just affirmed there was no NTSB report SlipperySlope Jan 2012 #5

Giving it a quick look over... Ohio Joe Jan 2012 #7

No problem SlipperySlope Jan 2012 #8

there is also a flight path study for 93 OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #3

You're about halfway there. Which part struck first? What happened afterward? nt antitsa Jan 2012 #6

halfway where? OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #9

Halfway to what I'm asking for. =) antitsa Jan 2012 #10

"Why? Odd question to ask in the conspiracy section." OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #11

Yes, what happened to it after it allegedly hit. antitsa Jan 2012 #12

OK, then, your "allegedly" sounds like a "I've already made up my mind, thanks" kinda "allegedly" OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #14

Sounds like you're not too confident about the official story. lol nt antitsa Jan 2012 #15

way to miss the point OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #17

What happened to it after? jberryhill Jan 2012 #13

I don't want to guess on the story you support. Just tell me what happened. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #16

"the story you support" jberryhill Jan 2012 #18

If you don't know the details, just say so. No shame in that. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #20

Okay, so we agree on the overall synopsis jberryhill Jan 2012 #23

"beyond that, there are likely many details." <-- That's what I'm asking for. antitsa Jan 2012 #26

"afterwards"? zappaman Jan 2012 #29

Please don't troll my thread. Thanks. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #30

not trolling zappaman Jan 2012 #31

Please don't troll my thread. Thanks. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #32

not trolling zappaman Jan 2012 #33

Don't you love that "my thread" stuff jberryhill Jan 2012 #35

why can't you tell us what happened to the plane "afterward"? zappaman Jan 2012 #37

A "million pieces"? jberryhill Jan 2012 #49

I din't count them myself zappaman Jan 2012 #52

Please don't troll your own subthread jberryhill Jan 2012 #53

the plane was in the air zappaman Jan 2012 #27

Please don't troll my thread. Thanks. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #28

not trolling zappaman Jan 2012 #34

Game is at 21, right? jberryhill Jan 2012 #36

maybe the poster should ask the NTSB zappaman Jan 2012 #38

Mods, can you ban zappaman & jberryhill from this thread, please? antitsa Jan 2012 #39

Please don't troll my thread. Thanks. nt zappaman Jan 2012 #40

uhhh..I think you are mistaken in your location. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #44

Thank you Dixiegrrrrl zappaman Jan 2012 #46

Can you be more specific about what is a "provocative message"? jberryhill Jan 2012 #47

Hmmmmmm zappaman Jan 2012 #48

mi enlace es su enlace jberryhill Jan 2012 #50

Hold on, let me consult my expert... dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #51

Welcome to DU jberryhill Jan 2012 #45

Waht happened was dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #19

Please don't troll my thread. Thanks. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #21

When did it become "my thread"? jberryhill Jan 2012 #22

Author: antitsa antitsa Jan 2012 #24

Just sweatin' bullets here, I assure you jberryhill Jan 2012 #25

Seems to me she answered you fine zappaman Jan 2012 #43

found something called "wikipedia" zappaman Jan 2012 #41

what do you mean by "supposedly"? zappaman Jan 2012 #42