Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: Paul Krugman: ‘Israeli government policies are a form of national suicide’ [View all]shira
(30,109 posts)31. I claim no one credible has said Beinart is antisemitic, as Krugman inferred...
Krugman brought up antisemitism within the context of "criticizing" Israel, not me.
When centuries old antisemitic tropes are used in such "criticism", that's antisemitic. Jews controlling too much, having loyalty to Israel over the USA. That's antisemitic, not criticism. Calling only the Jewish state a Nazi state or carrying out nazi like actions - only Israel mind you - is also antisemitic. The only reason Israel is compared to the Nazis is obvious. This Holocaust inversion is nothing but disgusting Jew baiting.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Paul Krugman: ‘Israeli government policies are a form of national suicide’ [View all]
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
OP
It is interesting that he said this is one reason he does not speak about the subject much at all.
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#7
Greenwald won't back down regardless and although he is Jewish, he does not carry the weight
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#55
What reason would Krugman have to defend Beinart..if it is so obvious to you that
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#9
You believe Krugman is lying on behalf of the deliberate liar Beinart and that
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#11
I'm delfecting? LOL This thread is about Paul Krugman's endorsement of the book
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#14
I asked you why do you believe Krugman would support the deliberate liar Beinart, your words.
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#17
Before I answer, realize that you very rarely directly address questions to you...
shira
Apr 2012
#18
Address what lies? YOU believe they're lies, I believe they hold an opinion worth
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#20
An opinion that conveniently leaves out facts in order to criticize unfairly is propaganda.
shira
Apr 2012
#30
They're lies to you and as I have said, the lack of support Israeli policies
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#37
The difference b/w us is that I have no problem defending my views & answering questions
shira
Apr 2012
#59
Is it your claim that Beinart has not received criticism for his political views on Israel? The
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#19
Then you don't know what "tantamount to" means, as he has used it. As for the remainder of your post
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#35
No, you don't know what it means. Tantamount to antisemitism means equivalent to...
shira
Apr 2012
#36
You're something else, you know that? Of course it applies, and could you at least
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#38
lol, no, oberliner, their job is merely becoming increasingly more difficult via individuals
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#54
Or that they're becoming somewhat more impotent in the face of "facts on the ground".
Crunchy Frog
Apr 2012
#58
While Beinart COULD be deliberately lying, Martin Sherman's words cannot be taken as evidence for
LeftishBrit
Apr 2012
#33
Yes, some people who claim to be leftists have hard-right views, or support those who do
LeftishBrit
Apr 2012
#53
I know, lol. You may find this amusing too, the last paragraph in particular.
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#16
A powerful piece and quite thoughtful. I imagine he was motivated in part, by the nightmare tactics
Jefferson23
Apr 2012
#47