Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
39. It is? So the USA is occupying over 25 other nations right now since US troops are deployed....
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 06:03 PM
Jul 2012

...in over 30 other countries?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_deployments

What good is it to not allow the freaks in Hamas airspace? Do you have to ask? With far nastier weapons, Hamas will ignite a war with Israel that will make OCL seem like kindergarten in comparison. Yours is a warmongering, anti-humanitarian position.

WRT the international community comparing Israel's "occupation" with other nations.... shira Jul 2012 #1
You must be getting desperate for comparisons! kayecy Jul 2012 #2
Since Oslo, Turkey has far more effective control of Cyprus than Israel does of Gaza or the WB... shira Jul 2012 #3
You agree Israel is the occupying power in Area C (62%)...... kayecy Jul 2012 #4
Sorry, but it's complete nonsense when you believe Gaza is still occupied... shira Jul 2012 #5
so you disagree with the UNSC interesting indeed n/t azurnoir Jul 2012 #6
I believe in one standard for all. Got a problem with that? n/t shira Jul 2012 #7
well seeing as how apparently azurnoir Jul 2012 #8
When the UN says that what NATO does in Libya is not occupation, and it's more invasive than Gaza... shira Jul 2012 #9
Still waiting for your apples & oranges comparison...... kayecy Jul 2012 #10
See #5. It's still a joke when you claim Gaza is occupied. There's no IDF presence there... shira Jul 2012 #12
The article you posted had nothing to do with Gaza.... kayecy Jul 2012 #21
Based on your response, it's obvious you can't defend the argument that Gaza is occupied... shira Jul 2012 #23
Thank you for at last getting round to explaining ....... kayecy Jul 2012 #24
Again, 4GC Article 6 makes it clear Israel doesn't meet the description of an occupying power... shira Jul 2012 #26
No...you believe in annexing the West Bank and telling the Palestinians Ken Burch Jul 2012 #14
Really? That's what I believe? Where'd you get that from? Now as to Hamas/occupation... shira Jul 2012 #17
The IDF isn't on the soil of Gaza Ken Burch Jul 2012 #27
Why do you repeat the same old, tired, refuted arguments? You make them, your arguments.... shira Jul 2012 #49
I actually think you really do believe King_David Jul 2012 #25
No, I don't claim to read minds Ken Burch Jul 2012 #28
Ken, prove what you are accusing me of. Or admit you're wrong. n/t shira Jul 2012 #33
You have repeatedly revived the "Jordan is Palestine" canard. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #40
So you think I'm for greater Israel, some form of apartheid, ethnic cleansing...or what? n/t shira Jul 2012 #46
At best, you're for reducing Palestinians to something like a Luxemburg-like statelet Ken Burch Jul 2012 #53
Really? After I've repeatedly said I'd accept the Clinton Initiatives and Olmert's offer... shira Jul 2012 #57
Links to prove your nasty claims? King_David Jul 2012 #59
It's not nasty. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #62
I am sure if it is not a fabrication, King_David Jul 2012 #65
This was a couple of months ago. I'll find it. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #67
No link huh ? King_David Jul 2012 #68
I just posted the link. Didn't you read it? Ken Burch Jul 2012 #70
Ken, be honest. Where did I back Eldad's proposal? Or anything remotely rightwing? shira Jul 2012 #78
You were talking about how it would be the ultimate "happy ending" Ken Burch Jul 2012 #79
Then summarize, please. I was very clear. Show me where my view = Eldad's. n/t shira Jul 2012 #82
you get really close to it in posts 25, 33, 43, 75 in the linked thread(among others) Ken Burch Jul 2012 #89
You've gotta be kidding. Well, this proves you only battle make-believe straw man arguments... shira Jul 2012 #96
Here's the link: Ken Burch Jul 2012 #69
"Nasty"......That is a very insulting heading.......... kayecy Jul 2012 #71
Almost as nasty as some posts King_David Jul 2012 #72
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #73
Just looked at one of your links, King_David Jul 2012 #74
None of those links match the order of the names you posted, which matched Rense... shira Jul 2012 #75
Just check out the site linked to ,it is even worse, King_David Jul 2012 #77
You call that proof enough to justify a NASTY libel? kayecy Jul 2012 #83
I did reply, King_David Jul 2012 #84
And things like THAT shouldn't be posted. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #86
Muddled post King_David Jul 2012 #52
If you feel that way, put me on ignore. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #54
What a Joke King_David Jul 2012 #58
If you think I'm a joke, put me on ignore Ken Burch Jul 2012 #63
Prove it, Link it up,this should be good. King_David Jul 2012 #60
Put you on ignore?! holdencaufield Jul 2012 #61
+ 1 King_David Jul 2012 #66
You don't believe any such thing. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #16
Double standards means more is expected from Israel than any other nation on earth... shira Jul 2012 #18
Nobody has denied that Turkey occupies Cyprus. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #31
When the EU accepted Cyprus, "occupation" was never mentioned. n/t shira Jul 2012 #47
I'm fairly sure, though, that they only accepted the Greek part of Cyprus. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #87
N.Cyprus is not an occupation to the EU, but Gaza somehow is... shira Jul 2012 #97
If another country controls your airspace and water supply, you are NOT sovereign. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #15
That's not an occupation, however. Cyprus is occupied. Gaza is not. n/t shira Jul 2012 #19
Nobody has denied that Cyprus is occupied Ken Burch Jul 2012 #29
The point of the OP is to show how Israel does not legally occupy Palestinian territory. shira Jul 2012 #34
Why are you obsessed with that one point? Ken Burch Jul 2012 #44
Why do you think Israel's accusers insist Gaza is occupied? What's their goal? n/t shira Jul 2012 #45
It's "critics of the Israeli government", not "Israel's accusers". Ken Burch Jul 2012 #88
Here's what I don't get Ken. Bradlad Jul 2012 #90
You're not making the distinctions that are needed Ken Burch Jul 2012 #91
You are the one who is avoiding . . Bradlad Jul 2012 #100
+1 holdencaufield Jul 2012 #101
After sleeping on this . . Bradlad Jul 2012 #105
Egypt is also responsible then for this faux-occupation (blockade) of Gaza.... shira Jul 2012 #98
Nobody has ever denied that Cyprus is occupied Ken Burch Jul 2012 #32
The difference b/w occupation and siege is trivial? Do you even know the difference? n/t shira Jul 2012 #35
It's occupation when another country's troops are on your soil Ken Burch Jul 2012 #38
It is? So the USA is occupying over 25 other nations right now since US troops are deployed.... shira Jul 2012 #39
Israel would have nothing to lose from allowing direct commercial airline service to Gaza. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #41
Which of course Hamas would never use for military purposes. Get real, Ken. n/t shira Jul 2012 #48
Satire is dead... shaayecanaan Jul 2012 #11
Occupation denial? really? Ken Burch Jul 2012 #13
You're consistent, Ken. Another straw man... shira Jul 2012 #20
You reference does not show that Israel has ended its occupation of Gaza..... kayecy Jul 2012 #22
If Gaza is occupied then Israel is obligated to govern there, carry out all law and order there... shira Jul 2012 #36
If your army is on another country's soil, without invitation, for all practical purposes Ken Burch Jul 2012 #30
ROTFLOL! Statement of the day... shira Jul 2012 #37
In a lot of ways, the U.S. has limited political choices in the countries where it's put troops Ken Burch Jul 2012 #42
You were wrong about troops on another nation's soil. You realized it and edited your post.... shira Jul 2012 #50
I clarified my post Ken Burch Jul 2012 #64
on that soil without invitation. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #43
You're wrong about that too. NATO intervened in Libya and the UN was careful... shira Jul 2012 #51
I'm not responsible for NATO's terminology. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #55
No, the UN made it clear that it wasn't an occupation. However, the UN maintains Gaza... shira Jul 2012 #56
What terminology would you use then? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #76
Blockade. n/t shira Jul 2012 #80
A blockade that will be lifted...? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #85
When the government of Gaza stops making war on Israel. Not a moment sooner. n/t shira Jul 2012 #93
And what is the determining factor in "stops making war" Scootaloo Jul 2012 #102
Is that not self-explanatory? NT holdencaufield Jul 2012 #103
Try me. Scootaloo Jul 2012 #104
It's not like that would be LESS unacceptable. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #92
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #94
Apartheid. eom Purveyor Jul 2012 #81
Gaza? A blockade is now an act of apartheid? Okayyyyy. n/t shira Jul 2012 #95
You keep using that word... holdencaufield Jul 2012 #99
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»The Levy Report and the ‘...»Reply #39