Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
The EPA plan for neonicotinoids is already in place. Buzz Clik May 2015 #1
You're kidding, right? RiverLover May 2015 #2
"Even with overwhelming evidence neonicotinoids are killing our insect pollinators..." No. Buzz Clik May 2015 #3
I disagree. Along with all environmental orgs. But no time to fight conservative lies atm. /nt RiverLover May 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik May 2015 #5
You are on the bleeding edge of being banned - rein it in. hatrack May 2015 #24
Really? You are defending this guy? Buzz Clik May 2015 #26
"Threaten"? No, just a statement of fact hatrack May 2015 #28
Oh please... gregcrawford May 2015 #6
Colony collapse is the disappearance of bees from the hive, not massive die-offs. Buzz Clik May 2015 #11
And the bees disappear because they are dying! gregcrawford May 2015 #16
Ok, you have no idea what you're talking about. You and I are done on this one. Buzz Clik May 2015 #17
Look in the mirror and say the same thing, please. Maybe you'll be nicer to yourself? RiverLover May 2015 #25
Neonicotinoids need to be banned. Owl May 2015 #7
1,000 recs swilton May 2015 #8
Of course, this is obvious, and was obvious FlatBaroque May 2015 #9
-1 Buzz Clik May 2015 #13
Corn Ethanol yellowwoodII May 2015 #10
Very interesting, good post. It must be so frustrating to see your neighbor farmer destroy natural RiverLover May 2015 #23
And even without the pesticide sprays, the wildlife dies ... Nihil May 2015 #27
Anyone serious about understanding this issue needs to read this: Buzz Clik May 2015 #12
And also read a study to understand facts discovered (but only if you're "serious"!) RiverLover May 2015 #14
Did you read the links I provided? Buzz Clik May 2015 #15
I read the paper from 2012 that you posted. He's says "to date" often for a reason. RiverLover May 2015 #18
Take a look at the concentrations used in the Harvard study. Buzz Clik May 2015 #19
Your arrogance is misplaced here. You are wrong. RiverLover May 2015 #20
What you interpret as "arrogance" is having a strong handle on the facts. Buzz Clik May 2015 #21
There it is again! RiverLover May 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Despite the new task forc...»Reply #6