Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

jpak

(41,755 posts)
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 03:00 PM Feb 2012

Why Did Leading Solar Panel Maker Solyndra Fail? [View all]

http://www.healthnewsdigest.com/news/Environment_380/Why_Did_Leading_Solar_Panel_Maker_Solyndra_Fail.shtml

HealthNewsDigest.com) - Solyndra was a California-based maker of thin-film solar cells affixed to cylindrical panels that could deliver more energy than conventional flat photovoltaic panels. The company’s novel system mounted these flexible cells, made of copper, indium, gallium and diselenide (so-called CIGS), onto cylindrical tubes where they could absorb energy from any direction, including from indirect and reflected light.

<snip>

What caused this shooting star of alternative energy to burn out so spectacularly after just six years in business and such a large investment? Part of what made Solyndra’s technology so promising was its low cost compared to traditional photovoltaic panels that relied on once costlier silicon. “When Solyndra launched, processed silicon was selling at historic highs, which made CIGS a cheaper option,” reports Rachel Swaby in Wired Magazine. “But silicon producers overreacted to the price run-up and flooded the market.” The result was that silicon prices dropped 90 percent, eliminating CIGS’ initial price advantage.

Another problem for Solyndra was the falling price of natural gas—the cleanest of the readily available fossil fuels—as extractors implemented new technologies including horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing to get at formerly inaccessible domestic reserves in shale rock. In 2001 shale gas accounted for two percent of U.S. natural gas output, while today that number is closer to 30 percent. The result of this increased supply is that the price of natural gas has fallen by some 77 percent since 2008, meaning utilities can produce electricity from it much cheaper as well. “Renewables simply can’t compete,” adds Swaby.

The final blow to Solyndra was China’s creation of a $30 billion credit line for its nascent solar industry. “The result: Chinese firms went from making just six percent of the world’s solar cells in 2005 to manufacturing more than half of them today,” says Swaby. U.S. market share is now just seven percent.

<more>
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
and "VERY POOR" design. PamW Feb 2012 #1
I have never seen anyone get so many things so wrong so consistently. kristopher Feb 2012 #4
My understanding is that both are indeed true ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #5
Support your "understanding" kristopher Feb 2012 #6
For Heaven's sake.... PamW Feb 2012 #7
Your description is inapt and your hyperbole is inept. kristopher Feb 2012 #9
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #11
For what it's worth caraher Feb 2012 #12
Agreed. PamW Feb 2012 #13
I've warned you. PamW Feb 2012 #8
You need to stop this Pam. kristopher Feb 2012 #10
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #14
What horseshit jpak Feb 2012 #15
So let me get this straight caraher Feb 2012 #16
Wow! That's one for the history books! bananas Feb 2012 #17
No solar for you jpak Feb 2012 #18
Interesting spin on the data, sounds like WSJ viewpoint saras Feb 2012 #2
Two current solar projects on the Carrizo Plain - pinto Feb 2012 #3
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Why Did Leading Solar Pan...»Reply #0