HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » Hillary Clinton Cheerlead... » Reply #16

Response to lewebley3 (Reply #15)

Sun Jul 13, 2014, 04:53 PM

16. Huge, huge difference between gay rights and GMO

Big Money interests made no profit from opposing gay rights. Therefore HRC was totally free to support gays. In fact, as far as the MIC goes, gay cannon fodder is interchangeable with straight cannon fodder, and they need that cannon fodder to operate the weapons from which they profit. So that was a win/win for HRC. Gets credits from pro-gays, and serves the interests of the MIC at the same time.

You must be unfamiliar w/ HRC's voting/speechifying records to say she always made a more liberal choice. The only times she sides with traditional, old fashioned, humanistic Democratic values is when there's no corporate opposition.

Plus, the issues do not balance out on a simplistic one for one ratio. GMO/Keystone Pipeline/ Iraq War/foreign trade agreements/child refugees/war mongering,as in unsuccessfully pushing Obama to go along with British General Sir David Richards' blood-thirsty proposition to arm and train 100,000 Syrian rebels. Each of these issues have more far-reaching impact upon the US (and much of the world) than the few liberal votes she's chosen to make. Sadly, HRC still believes she's got to out macho male politicians when it comes to making war.

Who is the true patriot, Hillary Clinton or Edward Snowden? The question comes up because Clinton has gone all out in attacking Snowden as a means of burnishing her hawkish credentials, eliciting Glenn Greenwald’s comment that she is “like a neocon, practically.”

On Friday in England, Clinton boasted that two years ago she had favored a proposal by a top British General to train 100,000 “moderate” rebels to overthrow the Assad regime in Syria, but Obama had turned her down. The American Thatcher? In that same interview with the Guardian she also managed to get in yet another shot against Snowden for taking refuge in Russia “apparently under Putin’s protection,” unless, she taunted, “he wishes to return knowing he would be held accountable.”

Accountable for telling the truth that Clinton concealed during her tenure as secretary of state in the Obama administration? Did she approve of the systematic spying on the American people as well as of others around the world, including the leaders of Germany and Brazil, or did she first learn of all this from the Snowden revelations?


Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 24 replies Author Time Post
Divernan Jul 2014 OP
Divernan Jul 2014 #1
Scuba Jul 2014 #4
Divernan Jul 2014 #6
Divernan Jul 2014 #2
NYC_SKP Jul 2014 #3
Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #5
Jack Rabbit Jul 2014 #7
LittleGirl Jul 2014 #8
Divernan Jul 2014 #13
LittleGirl Jul 2014 #14
Divernan Jul 2014 #19
LittleGirl Jul 2014 #22
hughee99 Jul 2014 #9
Divernan Jul 2014 #12
Voice for Peace Jul 2014 #10
roguevalley Jul 2014 #21
Voice for Peace Jul 2014 #11
lewebley3 Jul 2014 #15
LineLineNew Reply Huge, huge difference between gay rights and GMO
Divernan Jul 2014 #16
cprise Jul 2014 #17
Divernan Jul 2014 #18
cprise Jul 2014 #20
HooptieWagon Jul 2014 #23
Name removed Apr 2015 #24
Please login to view edit histories.