Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(29,798 posts)

5. Do you really think that is a relevant standard...

Sat Feb 18, 2012, 08:01 PM

Feb 2012

...by which to judge the role of current civilian nuclear power in the proliferation of nuclear weapons?

Really?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

2012’s Nuclear fault lines: Iran and Japan [View all] kristopher Feb 2012 OP

Actually NOT!!! PamW Feb 2012 #2

Save your breath, pam Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #3

Do you really think that is a relevant standard... kristopher Feb 2012 #5

What, reality? Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #6

It is unfortunate you can't actually conduct a discussion. kristopher Feb 2012 #7

Kris, you own article states civilian reactors aren't a requirement Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #8

No you can't. kristopher Feb 2012 #9

Yes kris. I'm part of the huge nuclear conspiracy that's out to get you. Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #10

ROFL kristopher Feb 2012 #11

I see me pointing something out, and you ignoring it. Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #12

You haven't pointed anything out. kristopher Feb 2012 #13

I have, but I can't make you see it. Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #14

Tricky to make it much clearer, kris Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #16

That there is an easier way doesn't mean you can't do it with a stone axe Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #18

Civilian nuclear power is an open invitation to nuclear weapons. kristopher Feb 2012 #19

One which... Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #20

FAULTY ERROR ERROR PamW Feb 2012 #21

Harvard vs Stanford PamW Feb 2012 #23

Actually not "NOT!!!" kristopher Feb 2012 #4

I'm alway surprised PamW Feb 2012 #22