Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Grist: Debunking the meat/climate change myth [View all]GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)18. There's no arguing with any of that.
I'm exploring this terrain because I've discovered that I have serious metabolic syndrome. In order to regain my health I have to cut virtually all starches and sugars out of my diet. The only realistic way for me to get enough calories in that situation is to eat more meat and its associated fat. Which goes against my ecological sensibilities something fierce. So this has forced me to look more carefully at both the biophysical and by extension the moral implications of eating meat.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The mass production of grain contributes as much or more to AGW and environmental disasters
GliderGuider
May 2014
#10
According to the FAO the world produces 8 times as much cereal grain as livestock.
GliderGuider
May 2014
#13
Exactly. The citation in the OP actually confirms the assertion, and the connection
villager
May 2014
#29
1 kg per person per day (people) is less than 6.7 billion tonnes per year (transportation)
muriel_volestrangler
May 2014
#23
And of course there's the issue that exhaled CO2 is part of the short-term carbon cycle.
GliderGuider
May 2014
#24
Years ago DU was the only place I could find a group who cared about the one thing I did
stuntcat
Jun 2014
#36