Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)

24. I have no idea what link you're referring to.

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #23)

Tue Sep 3, 2013, 11:42 AM

Sep 2013

I've provided many links in this thread.

The current media hysteria revolves around a leak which was found outside a drainpipe that was 90,000 ccs, and it was cleaned up.

In any case, ENENEWS.COM is hyperbolic trash and will be ignored.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bullshit reporting about Fukushima 18x higher than previously estimated (alarmist spoiler alert) [View all] wtmusic Sep 2013 OP

So they're taking "appropriate countermeasures" to keep the truth from coming out? Scuba Sep 2013 #1

Why? chervilant Sep 2013 #2

You'll get an answer anyway, for the benefit of anyone else who's reading. wtmusic Sep 2013 #4

well TEPCO says it's not so bad and you make fun of our skepticism CreekDog Sep 2013 #19

That's hilarious, wt. Posting Tepco press releases as if they're honest and trustworthy. . . Journeyman Sep 2013 #3

I told him the same thing before. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #5

What's hilarious is that your hysteria is based on Tepco press releases wtmusic Sep 2013 #6

Exactly what hysteria do you perceive I exhibit? I despise garbage burners, and their defenders. . . Journeyman Sep 2013 #7

A timeline: 1) The information about the high levels was provided by Tepco in press releases wtmusic Sep 2013 #9

And again, I ask, when have I engaged in this behavior you're convinced I'm a proponent of?. . . Journeyman Sep 2013 #11

Too easy wtmusic Sep 2013 #12

And what does this post have to do with your present commentary? . . . Journeyman Sep 2013 #13

And why are you refusing to answer my question using inane diversion tactics? wtmusic Sep 2013 #14

You're the one using them as an authority today. What have they done to garner your respect?. . . Journeyman Sep 2013 #15

How do you know Tepco didn't lie in their initial release? wtmusic Sep 2013 #16

And it was upgraded to a level 3 problem, so journeyman's scepticism was justified muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #20

Yes, and upgraded for no good reason, according to IAEA wtmusic Sep 2013 #22

'23 gallons'? Your own link says 300 tonnes muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #23

I have no idea what link you're referring to. wtmusic Sep 2013 #24

Your link in #22 to the South China Morning Post, since you're too lazy to check muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #25

"Lazy" is probably not accurate. wtmusic Sep 2013 #26

As you now know, tests on workers shows their exposure was higher in July muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #27

"previous similar events have not been rated" kristopher Sep 2013 #28

Tepco????? Really...Tepco???? dixiegrrrrl Sep 2013 #8

A big expensive mess... but not Bhopal. hunter Sep 2013 #10

Oh hush, you and your inconvenient facts ... Nihil Sep 2013 #17

Thank you for clearing that up. kristopher Sep 2013 #18

You're welcome. Thank you for providing such a splendid example of a non-sequitur. (n/t) Nihil Sep 2013 #21

No, no, I insist the honors are all to you and yours my dearest friend. kristopher Sep 2013 #29

Even at face value the TEPCO piece is a mess caraher Sep 2013 #30

And it sounds like you are the one reporting the bullshit madokie Sep 2013 #31

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #32