Environment & Energy

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)

20. Arnie is one great guy

Sat Feb 23, 2013, 01:15 PM

Feb 2013

And he has his theories. And he has not been proven wrong. What we do see is some nukers getting all worked up over his theories without offering any cogent real science backed explanations as to what really happened.

#3, as you know, Pam, is a one of a kind explosion and it will take many days of close examination of the whole assembly by nuclear scientists to finally come to a determination of what went wrong. That proper examination should be able to begin when the building can be humanly examined. Offhand, I'd say it could begin in 10 years, maybe more, maybe less. How long before humans can begin eyeballing the core, do you think, Pam? 10 years mol?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clear view in unit 3's pool (Fukushima) [View all] FBaggins Feb 2013 OP

looks as appetizing as the tanked water in LA hotels. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2013 #1

I understand that the taste was a bit "off". NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #3

Cherenkov blue nt Xipe Totec Feb 2013 #26

Cherenkov? I don't think so. PamW Feb 2013 #29

That would be true if the reactors were active and thus the highest source of radiation Xipe Totec Feb 2013 #30

Two years, right? RobertEarl Feb 2013 #2

Gundersen's theory was disproven as soon as we knew SFP3 held water. FBaggins Feb 2013 #4

So, under the bus with Gunderson is your point eh? Vinnie From Indy Feb 2013 #5

Under the bus? FBaggins Feb 2013 #7

Yes RobertEarl Feb 2013 #6

Sorry... you still haven't gotten any closer to knowing what you're talking about. FBaggins Feb 2013 #8

Duke paid attention to MOX RobertEarl Feb 2013 #9

None of that's true. FBaggins Feb 2013 #10

Yep, Plutonium all over. RobertEarl Feb 2013 #11

Duke wouldn't be processing their plutonium for them FBaggins Feb 2013 #13

You got one thing right. RobertEarl Feb 2013 #15

Nope. Got 'em all right. FBaggins Feb 2013 #16

Nothing about costs too much RobertEarl Feb 2013 #17

WRONG!!! WRONG!!! WRONG!!! PamW Feb 2013 #19

I know. How dare i question the science!! RobertEarl Feb 2013 #22

You have a right to your own opinion.. PamW Feb 2013 #25

If you knew the history, you would know that's what "unable to reach agreement" meant. FBaggins Feb 2013 #21

Nothing about costs yet? RobertEarl Feb 2013 #23

Actually, there was another hydrogen explosion.. PamW Feb 2013 #27

FBaggins is correct!! PamW Feb 2013 #31

Gundersen is a FIRST CLASS IDIOT!!! PamW Feb 2013 #18

Arnie is one great guy RobertEarl Feb 2013 #20

Arnie is an IDIOT!!! PamW Feb 2013 #24

High radiation bars decommissioning of Fukushima plant kristopher Feb 2013 #12

Wrong thread FBaggins Feb 2013 #14

Uh-oh. I think I see a Despair Squid. n/t Ian David Feb 2013 #28