A nuclear proponent makes the case for nuclear power.

[FBaggins]

5. Can't get by without the straw men, eh?

Find something that you think you can refute and then start with the claim that it constitutes the sum total of the opposing position.

Convenient... if you can get anyone to fall for it.

In reality... this piece came out yesterday morning and I didn't even consider posting it... because it does such a lousy job of making the case for nuclear power. He makes several errors and (as if that weren't enough) he's a former c-level exec for Shell. Not exactly the ideal source for low-carbon solutions.

The hilarious part of it though... is that he tries to limit the universe of acceptable solutions to just three technologies.

Do you see the irony?