Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)

1. Tamino apparently already took it apart.

Reply to Systematic Chaos (Original post)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 10:45 PM

Jan 2013

Except I can't understand HIS math either

Start here: http://citizenschallenge.blogspot.ca/2013/01/polynomial-cointegration-tests-of.html

Near the end of the blog article, the author quotes a FB convo between the SkepticalScience guys and a denier eager to score some points. SS makes it absolutely clear that the methodology used in the paper was invalid, so its results are meaningless.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here's a "paper" claiming no AGW using cointegration. Who wants to rip this shit apart? [View all] Systematic Chaos Jan 2013 OP

Tamino apparently already took it apart. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #1

You are my hero! Systematic Chaos Jan 2013 #4

No need to argue. Nature bats last. Speck Tater Jan 2013 #2

This bullshit has been floating in the bowl since at least 2010. Warren Stupidity Jan 2013 #3