Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Finishline42

(1,091 posts)
5. BTW, this says 0.8 gram per sq meter of perovskite PV
Sat Aug 15, 2020, 03:58 PM
Aug 2020
However, lead is toxic and must not enter the food chain. On the other hand, very little lead is needed for a solar module: a square metre perovskite solar module contains only 0.8 grams of lead, which is very little compared to other technical sources of lead (e.g. in batteries).

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/01/200121112945.htm#:~:text=However%2C%20lead%20is%20toxic%20and,lead%20(e.g.%20in%20batteries).
Perovskite has been a Holy Grail Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #1
A bigger deal is that these lead laced perovskites will be killing people in 25 years. NNadir Aug 2020 #2
You miss the good climate news update Finishline42 Aug 2020 #4
World's coal has been falling since 2013, albeit not in a straight line. 2019 lower by 3.3% progree Aug 2020 #11
BTW, this says 0.8 gram per sq meter of perovskite PV Finishline42 Aug 2020 #5
Yep. I run into this type of claim all the time Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #8
Wow, "solar scam"? Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #6
He's a big nuclear fan Finishline42 Aug 2020 #9
The solution is in cheaper and denser "battery" tech Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #10
0.8 grams of lead "isn't much?" For whom? NNadir Aug 2020 #12
So, much misinformation Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #13
Really? Misinformation? "Fake news?" "Talking points" Your references for this claim are what? NNadir Aug 2020 #16
See, I have read a number of your prior posts on this topic and see a pattern Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #17
Post removed Post removed Aug 2020 #33
I never compared you to Trump Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #34
A link to your tables from the IEA WEO 2019 report and tables derived from it progree Aug 2020 #19
Right on cue... Finishline42 Aug 2020 #18
I have had constructive discussions Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #20
Lead from rotting solar panels has a half life of FOREVER. hunter Aug 2020 #27
*sigh* Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #29
Sigh. Bye. hunter Aug 2020 #31
Yes, bye indeed. Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #32
I wonder what the cost and life span is of this type of solar panel. I have a total of 30 panels, in2herbs Aug 2020 #3
The panels are warranted to 80% rated output for 25 years Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #7
Y'all really shouldn't beat each other up so much... k2qb3 Aug 2020 #14
I agree but while we are investing in long-term renewable energy why can't solar be an in2herbs Aug 2020 #15
I'm not sure how to respond. k2qb3 Aug 2020 #21
AOC and Markey have a green plan that, from what I've read, Biden is exploring. nt in2herbs Aug 2020 #24
My thought has been a program to expand solar for schools and govt Finishline42 Aug 2020 #28
Just for context, since I'm new to the group... k2qb3 Aug 2020 #30
Solar+battery works Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #23
That the secret -- stop allowing the govt to give subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. Use that in2herbs Aug 2020 #25
If subsides to FF were cut, Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #26
Not a proponent of bio-fuels Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»UK firm's solar power bre...»Reply #5