Environment & Energy

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)

15. wow

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:20 PM

Apr 2012

Do you know how far the radiation spreads in the Pacific? Did you know they have found it off the coast of California?

You might try to answer the other points instead of going off on tangents. But like you say, Chernobyl, 25 years later is NOT cleaned up. And pray tell, how do we go about collecting all the plutonium that HAS been spread from Fuku?

And while you at it, tell us just how much plutonium may be in the spent fuel pools at Fuku? All the while remembering that there were no spent fuel pools, or much if any plutonium at Chernobyl.

Anyway, your argument is against Senator Wyden and guess who I am gonna side with? You, or Wyden?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senator Wyden: Fukushima Worse Than Reported [View all] BridgeTheGap Apr 2012 OP

thank you Senator Wyden n/t grasswire Apr 2012 #1

all the pro-nuclear folks should pay a visit Voice for Peace Apr 2012 #2

Creativity really isn't the problem. kristopher Apr 2012 #7

I guess what I meant is that the people in power Voice for Peace Apr 2012 #10

I really don't understand . . . Richard D Apr 2012 #3

So true. Maybe they are minimizing the raouldukelives Apr 2012 #6

Because as per Rachel Maddow last week... Javaman Apr 2012 #8

Thats the part that sticks in my crawl madokie Apr 2012 #11

Like the unsinkable Titanic? RobertEarl Apr 2012 #13

It was their arrogance that did us all in... Javaman Apr 2012 #19

Because it's not a threat to the world jeff47 Apr 2012 #9

We have us ANOTHER expert, eh? RobertEarl Apr 2012 #12

If you want to claim a threat, do the math. jeff47 Apr 2012 #14

wow RobertEarl Apr 2012 #15

Detecting a molecule is easy. Getting harmed by it, not so much. jeff47 Apr 2012 #16

wow again RobertEarl Apr 2012 #17

So kids and especially female kids live in lead-lined safes? jeff47 Apr 2012 #22

I know you Javaman Apr 2012 #23

Feel free to cite any incorrect fact. (nt) jeff47 Apr 2012 #40

Wrong again. FBaggins Apr 2012 #24

Oh? RobertEarl Apr 2012 #26

Yes. FBaggins Apr 2012 #27

So robots will save us all! Javaman Apr 2012 #20

You are aware that people invent new stuff, right? jeff47 Apr 2012 #21

robots are going to save us all!!! Javaman Apr 2012 #38

Well, considering your claim is we have to abandon Japan for the next few hundred years jeff47 Apr 2012 #39

Where did I say that? Javaman Apr 2012 #41

More.... abelenkpe Apr 2012 #4

Big technical hurdle to be overcome RobertEarl Apr 2012 #18

Well... it looks like you spelled that correctly FBaggins Apr 2012 #25

Guess this is news to you? RobertEarl Apr 2012 #28

It would be news to anyone FBaggins Apr 2012 #29

it was dumb RobertEarl Apr 2012 #30

You're really pro-nuke, aren't you? FBaggins Apr 2012 #31

What.... RobertEarl Apr 2012 #32

Thanks for making it so easy. FBaggins Apr 2012 #33

that is sad, FBaggins RobertEarl Apr 2012 #34

Lol... I've only give you facts. FBaggins Apr 2012 #35

Your one fact RobertEarl Apr 2012 #36

Claiming it's "asinine" just puts your own ignorance on display. FBaggins Apr 2012 #37

Check this JEB Apr 2012 #5