Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
8. Three Mile Island was a classic.
Sat May 19, 2018, 10:02 AM
May 2018

Alarmists were howling, "See, it proves that nuclear plants are dangerous, lethal."

Actually, it proved that nuclear plant designers had been overly pessimistic in their assumptions, and had produced a plant which was far more safe during an operational mishap that it was thought it would be. There was a scenario called the "China syndrome" which assumed that if the core was even partially exposed to air it melt down, melt through the bottom of the container and down into the Earth, causing widespread destruction and nuclear fallout. Three Mile Island's core was exposed to air, for quite a lengthy time, and it did not melt at all. The reactor was damaged but repairable.

Fukushima's reactors are "boiling water" reactors and prove nothing about this nation's "pressurized water" reactors, which are a very different type and far more robust both in operation and in ability to withstand external accident.

I personally think you are wrong Vinnie From Indy May 2018 #1
I personally KNOW I am right, and I very much have the motivation and responsibility... NNadir May 2018 #2
I happen to work in the power industry captain queeg May 2018 #3
Have they found a way to rid the planet of nuclear waste yet? Control-Z May 2018 #4
Of course you're not interested. In order to oppose nuclear energy... NNadir May 2018 #6
All fossil fuels contribute to global warming captain queeg May 2018 #5
Hear! Hear! aka-chmeee May 2018 #7
Three Mile Island was a classic. JayhawkSD May 2018 #8
The US has plenty of BWRs caraher May 2018 #10
You left off another important point FBaggins May 2018 #11
I figured that much was obvious caraher May 2018 #12
You can always rationalize away the accidents that happen at nuclear plants by saying Finishline42 May 2018 #14
As a civil/environmental engineer I generally agree with your position on nuclear. Also, didn't Bil c-rational May 2018 #9
Wind capacity factor cstar May 2018 #13
Yes. The renewable scam complaining about "subsidies" is like Donald Trump complaining... NNadir May 2018 #15
A society powered by renewable energy would look nothing like the industrial consumer society... hunter May 2018 #16
baseload is the only way? cstar May 2018 #17
Every time this nuclear vs. renewable debate heats up, I notice something. StevieM May 2018 #18
Good point cstar May 2018 #19
Thank you for your post. StevieM May 2018 #24
Actually, using thermochemical water and/or carbon dioxide splitting cycles, petroleum and gas... NNadir May 2018 #20
Thank you for your post. I appreciate the work you put into making your arguments. StevieM May 2018 #21
I know you asked NNadir, but here's a link to International DME trade group... hunter May 2018 #22
Thank you for your questions. It's no sweat on my part. NNadir May 2018 #23
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»2017: Number of US Nuclea...»Reply #8