Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: "How did we get a host?" a locked thread asks? Here is the answer. [View all]FBaggins
(26,729 posts)You didn't advocate for dual systems. You wanted a purge that would allow you to decide what was "disruption" and what was "positive discussion" (when you have no track record of correctly identifying either). You position wasn't "either no host or dual groups"... it was the current structure but with you running things (expressing continued ignorance of what the host's role was to be).
It was only after it was clear that you couldn't gain anything like a consensus for your putsch that you've suddenly seen a new light. Not surprisingly, you still want a result that ends with you being free to post whatever you like without even a challenge/debate.
That's not DU (1, 2, or 3). Start your own board if that's what you want.
What is clear to most but obviously hidden to you is that there are plenty of progressives on both sides of this debate. Not just on DU, but around the world.
I would also like to see an end to the disruptive hectoring and campaigns of social bullying and character assassination
If that were true you wouldn't be here.
against those who are against nuclear power.
Oops. Sorry. My mistake. Discrimination is fine... as long as we get rid of the right people.
The amazing thing to me is that you actually read these diatribes and think that they reinforce your claim to objectivity and fairness.
As a direct reply to the "dual groups" BS. I'm sure that it's clear to almost everyone that this is nonsense. There is an actual dialog to be had here. We actually do need to craft solutions to climate issues. "Seperate but equal" purdahs is not a solution.