Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
1. Not really science
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:51 PM
Feb 2013
“Research has established that continued exposure to media violence (e.g., TV, movies, video games) can increase the likelihood of physically and verbally aggressive behavior, aggressive thoughts, and aggressive emotions. Exposure to violence in the media can lead to (1) displacement of healthy activities, (2) modeling inappropriate behaviors, (3) disinhibition of socially proscribed behaviors, (4) desensitization to the harmful effects of violence, (5) aggressive arousal, and (6) association with a constellation of risk-taking behaviors.


The guy who wrote that, Dr. Craig Anderson:

Proponents against the video game violence and aggression effect state that Dr. Anderson's research has been criticized at times for overstating his results and failing to adequately acknowledge alternate views or limitations of the data on media violence. A number of scholars have expressed the concern that his statements of causal certainty regarding video game violence effects are not well supported by the existing data.[3][4] Anderson also had ties to the former National Institute on Media and the Family (NIMF), which Jerald Block, a psychiatrist at the Oregon Health Science University, likened to a lobbying group,[5] and some of his studies have been funded by NIMF.[6] In Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, testimonies were provided criticizing Anderson's studies, noting that they "have been rejected by every court to consider them", "do not prove that violent video games cause minors to act aggressively", and "suffer from significant, admitted flaws in methodology".[7]
However, it is worth noting that Dr. Anderson's views regarding the relationship between video game violence and aggression have been endorsed by some other authors who are experts in media effects,[8] and by the American Psychological Association's 2005 resolution on electronic media violence, although the APA later declined to participate in the Brown v. EMA case, citing inconsistencies in the research.[9]


The point: His studies are flawed. Studies saying media caused these things are almost all flawed. Don't use flawed studies to make policy.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Obama Goes With Science O...»Reply #1