Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Trace the Long and Winding Road February 7-9, 2014 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)42. Should Scotland Become Independent?
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2014/02/07/scottish_independence_is_small_beautiful.html
Scotland's independence referendum later this year hasn't gotten much coverage in the United States and most of the coverage I have seen has largely reflected the international community's knee-jerk hostility to the redrawing of borders.
But I have to say that my priors go in the other direction, and I'm favorably disposed. The main reason is that it seems to me that in the European context where everyone is a stable democracy with a mixed-market economy, the small countries (Netherlands, Denmark, Finland, etc.) are generally a lot better run than the bigger ones. For one thing, smaller countries have simpler institutional arrangements since you're not trying to accommodate size by embedding complicated federalism mechanisms into the already complicated framework of the European Union. But for another thing, I think the debate over welfare state design gets more sensible when you're talking about a small jurisdiction. A place like Scotland is a sufficiently small share of the United Kingdom that it makes sense for a Scottish political activist to be more focused on "how much money does this program bring to Scotland?" than on "how good is this program at generating social benefits in a cost-effective way?" An independent Scotlandlike an independent Wallonia or other possible new European mini-stateswould have politics that I think would ultimately be more constructive.
Of course maybe not. Don't mistake this for a thorough investigation of the ins-and-outs of independence for Scotland.
But if you think about the larger context of the "European Project" then I think it really does make sense to become more favorable to European independence movements in general. Creating a continent-wide zone of peace and market integration was enormously hard work. One of the major benefits of that work is to create an international landscape that's much friendlier to the interests of small nations. The kind of place where Belgium doesn't get trampled simply because it's sitting on the optimal invasion route into France. That people in Scotland and Catalonia and Flanders and elsewhere are pushing to take advantage of those gains seems very sensible to me.
Scotland's independence referendum later this year hasn't gotten much coverage in the United States and most of the coverage I have seen has largely reflected the international community's knee-jerk hostility to the redrawing of borders.
But I have to say that my priors go in the other direction, and I'm favorably disposed. The main reason is that it seems to me that in the European context where everyone is a stable democracy with a mixed-market economy, the small countries (Netherlands, Denmark, Finland, etc.) are generally a lot better run than the bigger ones. For one thing, smaller countries have simpler institutional arrangements since you're not trying to accommodate size by embedding complicated federalism mechanisms into the already complicated framework of the European Union. But for another thing, I think the debate over welfare state design gets more sensible when you're talking about a small jurisdiction. A place like Scotland is a sufficiently small share of the United Kingdom that it makes sense for a Scottish political activist to be more focused on "how much money does this program bring to Scotland?" than on "how good is this program at generating social benefits in a cost-effective way?" An independent Scotlandlike an independent Wallonia or other possible new European mini-stateswould have politics that I think would ultimately be more constructive.
Of course maybe not. Don't mistake this for a thorough investigation of the ins-and-outs of independence for Scotland.
But if you think about the larger context of the "European Project" then I think it really does make sense to become more favorable to European independence movements in general. Creating a continent-wide zone of peace and market integration was enormously hard work. One of the major benefits of that work is to create an international landscape that's much friendlier to the interests of small nations. The kind of place where Belgium doesn't get trampled simply because it's sitting on the optimal invasion route into France. That people in Scotland and Catalonia and Flanders and elsewhere are pushing to take advantage of those gains seems very sensible to me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Weekend Economists Trace the Long and Winding Road February 7-9, 2014 [View all]
Demeter
Feb 2014
OP
As U.S. hits debt limit, business group urges Congress to raise it HERE WE GO AGAIN...
Demeter
Feb 2014
#8
Robert Reich to Obama: Don't Play Semantics, Savage Inequality Is Our Most Urgent Problem
Demeter
Feb 2014
#15
Yadkin Valley Financial Corp. (NORTH CAROLINA) exits wholesale mortgage business
Demeter
Feb 2014
#50