http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/25/opinion/krugman-austerity-italian-style.html?_r=0
Two months ago, when Mario Monti stepped down as Italys prime minister, The Economist opined that The coming election campaign will be, above all, a test of the maturity and realism of Italian voters. The mature, realistic action, presumably, would have been to return Mr. Monti who was essentially imposed on Italy by its creditors to office, this time with an actual democratic mandate.
Well, its not looking good. Mr. Montis party appears likely to come in fourth; not only is he running well behind the essentially comical Silvio Berlusconi, hes running behind an actual comedian, Beppe Grillo, whose lack of a coherent platform hasnt stopped him from becoming a powerful political force.
Its an extraordinary prospect, and one that has sparked much commentary about Italian political culture. But without trying to defend the politics of bunga bunga, let me ask the obvious question: What good, exactly, has what currently passes for mature realism done in Italy or for that matter Europe as a whole?
For Mr. Monti was, in effect, the proconsul installed by Germany to enforce fiscal austerity on an already ailing economy; willingness to pursue austerity without limit is what defines respectability in European policy circles. This would be fine if austerity policies actually worked but they dont. And far from seeming either mature or realistic, the advocates of austerity are sounding increasingly petulant and delusional.