Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Economy

jody

(26,624 posts)

19. "Last warning" LOL Dog Gone at Penigma with 269 posts. nt

Reply to Dog Gone at Penigma (Reply #18)

Thu Dec 27, 2012, 07:28 PM

Dec 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

guns and the social economics of mandatory liability insurance and taxation [View all] Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 OP

How about drone insurance? westerebus Dec 2012 #1

Do you own a drone that is weapons capable? Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #14

No more than the OP wandered into the all inclusive guns be evil debate. westerebus Dec 2012 #20

you are incorrect Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #35

Already addressed the liability issue re: governmental immunity on par with uninsured motorist. westerebus Dec 2012 #36

FBI reports "Hands, fists, feet, etc." commit 5.7% of murders, Rifles and Shotguns for 5.4%. jody Dec 2012 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author mbperrin Dec 2012 #3

Your problem is you believe guns create crime and the FACT that other things cause jody Dec 2012 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author mbperrin Dec 2012 #5

1. NO. 2. where is economics in any way part of your contribution to this discussion? Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author mbperrin Dec 2012 #21

all guns should be both insured and taxed Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author mbperrin Dec 2012 #22

I"m one of the hosts for the economy group, so YES i will take on the 'moderator' role, as you call Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #24

Not at all - it is only necessary to establish that guns are part of some crime Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #10

You say "we have established that firearms are a problem" is as ridiculous as saying "we have jody Dec 2012 #13

not at all Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #25

There can be no economic effect if guns do not create crime. Fact is gun # has jody Dec 2012 #30

actually, let me amend that - it is not necessary to establish or prove crime at all to tax/insure Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #17

You have an OP problem it lumped all firearms together. nt jody Dec 2012 #6

That in NOT a problem Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #18

"Last warning" LOL Dog Gone at Penigma with 269 posts. nt jody Dec 2012 #19

are you being humorous? Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #8

Murder is not humorous to me but proposals that are utterly ridiculous do have a sad humor to them jody Dec 2012 #11

violence is not humorous either Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #15

"on topic for this subject" after you answer #2 nt jody Dec 2012 #16

Any constitutionally protected right may not be impeded by taxation Yo_Mama Dec 2012 #7

not true Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #9

So we can have a poll tax then? Remmah2 Dec 2012 #29

false equivalency Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #31

We can pass an amendment for a poll tax then. Remmah2 Dec 2012 #33

In theory - yes Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #34

Should drinkers and drug users have liability insurance before being served? Remmah2 Dec 2012 #26

don't be silly Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #27

SOP Remmah2 Dec 2012 #28

and the 24th amendment outlawing any poll tax mean that there is no impediment to other taxation Dog Gone at Penigma Dec 2012 #32