HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Economy & Education » Economy (Group) » Weekend Economists and th... » Reply #25

Response to Demeter (Original post)

Sat Jun 23, 2012, 04:39 AM

25. Michael Hudson/Jeffrey Sommers: Latvia is No Model for Austerity

 

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/06/michael-hudsonjeffrey-sommers-latvia-is-no-model-for-austerity.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29

Michael Hudson and Jeffery Sommers, a distinguished professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City and associate professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee respectively, who have both advised members of Latvia’s government on alternatives to austerity. They are also contributors to the forthcoming book by Routledge Press: The Contradictions of Austerity: The Socio-Economic Costs of the Neoliberal Baltic Model. Cross posted from the Financial Times by permission of the authors

***********************************************************************************

Austerity’s advocates depict Latvia as a plucky country that can show Europe the way out of its financial dilemma – by “internal devaluation”, or slashing wages. Yet few of the enthusiastic commentators have spent enough time in the country to understand what happened. Its government has chosen austerity, its people have not. Finding no acceptable alternative, much of the labour force has elected to emigrate. This is a major factor holding down its unemployment rate to “just” 15 per cent today. Latvia is not a model for austerity in Greece or anywhere else. Both the impression that neoliberal policy has been a success and the claim that Latvians have voted to support this failed model are incorrect. Latvia’s one year of solid economic growth since its economy plunged by 25 per cent in 2008-10 is billed as a success. Then, unemployment soared above 20 per cent as the shutdown of foreign capital inflows (mainly Swedish mortgage loans to inflate its real estate bubble) left Latvia with a deep current-account deficit. It had to choose between devaluation or maintaining the euro peg.

It chose the latter in order to proceed towards euro accession. To meet the eurozone criteria it cut public sector wages by 30 per cent, driving down overall wage levels and consumption to match its low labour productivity. The doctrine was that this shock therapy and poverty would soon restore prosperity. What enabled Latvia to survive the crisis were EU and IMF bailouts – whose repayments will soon fall due. Relatively low public sector debt (9 per cent of gross domestic product at the start of the crisis) also provided some protection from bond traders. Latvia’s problem was mostly private sector debt, especially mortgage debt, which is secured not only by property but by the personal liability of entire families of joint signatories. The bank insurance agency insisted on this measure as it saw unaffordable housing prices being inflated by reckless bank lending. (Its job was to protect the banks, not the economy.)

The resulting austerity programme is anything but popular. Latvia’s parliament often polls approval ratings in the single-digits. Yet the government has survived two elections. How is one to read this? Chiefly by ethnic politics. The biggest party opposing the austerity programme (Harmony Centre) largely represents ethnic Russians and had no chance of winning given its focus on rights for Russian speakers. The smaller parties run by post-Soviet oligarchs also are seen as being in league with Russia and are widely resented for fiscal imprudence during the boom years, when oligarch-controlled parties were part of the governing coalition. So the only political force left is the “austerians”. While most voters dislike their economic policy, a majority are convinced that they are best able to resist Russia’s embrace. All other issues come a distant second for Latvian voters. That said, Latvians have protested against austerity. In January 2009, in the dead of winter, 10,000 protested in Riga. Teachers, nurses and farmers held demonstrations of their own. The police were called to suppress protests over the closure of a hospital. After these protests subsided, Latvians resigned themselves and began to emigrate. Demographers estimate that 200,000 have left in the past decade – nearly 10 per cent of the population – at an accelerating rate that reflects the austerity being inflicted.

MORE GLOOM

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 76 replies Author Time Post
Demeter Jun 2012 OP
Demeter Jun 2012 #1
Demeter Jun 2012 #2
Demeter Jun 2012 #11
Demeter Jun 2012 #13
Demeter Jun 2012 #20
Demeter Jun 2012 #3
Demeter Jun 2012 #4
Demeter Jun 2012 #5
Demeter Jun 2012 #7
Demeter Jun 2012 #8
Demeter Jun 2012 #6
Demeter Jun 2012 #16
Demeter Jun 2012 #17
Po_d Mainiac Jun 2012 #22
westerebus Jun 2012 #45
Demeter Jun 2012 #46
westerebus Jun 2012 #68
Po_d Mainiac Jun 2012 #58
westerebus Jun 2012 #67
Demeter Jun 2012 #9
Demeter Jun 2012 #10
Demeter Jun 2012 #12
Demeter Jun 2012 #14
Demeter Jun 2012 #15
Demeter Jun 2012 #18
Demeter Jun 2012 #19
Demeter Jun 2012 #21
Demeter Jun 2012 #23
Demeter Jun 2012 #24
LineReply Michael Hudson/Jeffrey Sommers: Latvia is No Model for Austerity
Demeter Jun 2012 #25
Demeter Jun 2012 #26
xchrom Jun 2012 #27
DemReadingDU Jun 2012 #29
Demeter Jun 2012 #33
xchrom Jun 2012 #34
Tansy_Gold Jun 2012 #59
Demeter Jun 2012 #35
DemReadingDU Jun 2012 #38
Demeter Jun 2012 #40
Fuddnik Jun 2012 #44
Fuddnik Jun 2012 #42
DemReadingDU Jun 2012 #43
DemReadingDU Jun 2012 #28
Demeter Jun 2012 #36
Tansy_Gold Jun 2012 #60
xchrom Jun 2012 #30
Demeter Jun 2012 #32
xchrom Jun 2012 #31
Demeter Jun 2012 #37
Demeter Jun 2012 #39
Demeter Jun 2012 #41
Demeter Jun 2012 #47
Demeter Jun 2012 #48
Demeter Jun 2012 #49
westerebus Jun 2012 #69
Demeter Jun 2012 #65
Demeter Jun 2012 #50
Demeter Jun 2012 #51
Demeter Jun 2012 #52
DemReadingDU Jun 2012 #56
Demeter Jun 2012 #53
Fuddnik Jun 2012 #55
Po_d Mainiac Jun 2012 #57
Hotler Jun 2012 #71
Demeter Jun 2012 #72
Fuddnik Jun 2012 #54
Ghost Dog Jun 2012 #61
Demeter Jun 2012 #62
Ghost Dog Jun 2012 #63
Demeter Jun 2012 #66
Fuddnik Jun 2012 #70
Demeter Jun 2012 #73
Fuddnik Jun 2012 #75
Demeter Jun 2012 #64
Demeter Jun 2012 #74
Demeter Jun 2012 #76
Please login to view edit histories.