Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wednesday, 2 May 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)18. The Student Loan Tax by Alan White
http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2012/04/the-student-loan-tax.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+creditslips/feed+%28Credit+Slips%29
As student loan debt passed the $1 trillion mark, President Obama, speaking at Chapel Hill yesterday, called the upcoming interest rate hike on student loans a tax. He didnt tell the half of it. Congress dirty secret is that the government makes a huge annual profit on student loans. According to the scrupulously nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, $37 billion will flow IN to Treasury from student loans made this fiscal year at the 3.4% rate (on a net present value basis and net of about $1.5 billion to administer them.) The Presidents current dispute with Congressional Republicans is about whether to increase this annual profit next year. The interest rate that students pay on the basic subsidized loan is slated to rise from 3.4% this year to 6.8% next year, unless the lower rate is extended by Congress.
How does the government profit from student loans? In two words, yield spread.
Treasury can borrow money at 0.5% or less, and lends it to students at 3.4%. Administrative costs are well below 1%. Prepayment risk is minimal; repayment stretches over many, many years, and the yield spread just keeps on coming. Interest rate risk is also minimal, given that Treasury can issue debt in a range of maturities.
What about the credit losses, you ask? While many loans go into default (about 10% projected for 2013 loans), credit losses are relatively modest. The Education Department assumes it will collect between 75% and 80% of defaulted loans (on a discounted NPV basis), using its supercreditor powers, especially wage garnishment and tax refund intercepts. There is no statute of limitations on student loans, and even bankruptcy discharge is difficult. The $37 billion Treasury profit for FY2012 is after allowing for estimated credit losses in the $5 billion range.
Treasury even profits on the loans made by banks and guaranteed by the government, although bank loans are costlier and less efficient than direct loans. Guaranteed student loans generate revenue because the guarantee fees paid by lenders to Uncle Sam greatly exceed losses net of recoveries. In other words, if student loan interest rates were set on a break-even basis, they would be much lower, perhaps around 1.5%, albeit rising as Treasury rates rise. Recently adopted loan forgiveness programs, and the expansion of income-based repayment, may increase the cost (or reduce the profit) of the student loan program in the long run, but so far CBO scores those loan modification costs as minimal....
Interest rate policy has huge consequences for the American middle class. Charging an above-cost rate in order to fund Pell grants for low-income students, for example, is justifiable on a theory akin to equity financing of human capital. It is a cross-subsidy from successful college grads to needy college students whose future success is uncertain. A similar case can be made for expanded subsidy and loan forgiveness programs for college graduates in low-paying but socially necessary occupations. On the other hand, the rationale to tax student loan borrowers to fund tax cuts for the wealthy, subsidies for energy and agriculture or other unrelated federal expenditures, is less clear.
As student loan debt passed the $1 trillion mark, President Obama, speaking at Chapel Hill yesterday, called the upcoming interest rate hike on student loans a tax. He didnt tell the half of it. Congress dirty secret is that the government makes a huge annual profit on student loans. According to the scrupulously nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, $37 billion will flow IN to Treasury from student loans made this fiscal year at the 3.4% rate (on a net present value basis and net of about $1.5 billion to administer them.) The Presidents current dispute with Congressional Republicans is about whether to increase this annual profit next year. The interest rate that students pay on the basic subsidized loan is slated to rise from 3.4% this year to 6.8% next year, unless the lower rate is extended by Congress.
How does the government profit from student loans? In two words, yield spread.
Treasury can borrow money at 0.5% or less, and lends it to students at 3.4%. Administrative costs are well below 1%. Prepayment risk is minimal; repayment stretches over many, many years, and the yield spread just keeps on coming. Interest rate risk is also minimal, given that Treasury can issue debt in a range of maturities.
What about the credit losses, you ask? While many loans go into default (about 10% projected for 2013 loans), credit losses are relatively modest. The Education Department assumes it will collect between 75% and 80% of defaulted loans (on a discounted NPV basis), using its supercreditor powers, especially wage garnishment and tax refund intercepts. There is no statute of limitations on student loans, and even bankruptcy discharge is difficult. The $37 billion Treasury profit for FY2012 is after allowing for estimated credit losses in the $5 billion range.
Treasury even profits on the loans made by banks and guaranteed by the government, although bank loans are costlier and less efficient than direct loans. Guaranteed student loans generate revenue because the guarantee fees paid by lenders to Uncle Sam greatly exceed losses net of recoveries. In other words, if student loan interest rates were set on a break-even basis, they would be much lower, perhaps around 1.5%, albeit rising as Treasury rates rise. Recently adopted loan forgiveness programs, and the expansion of income-based repayment, may increase the cost (or reduce the profit) of the student loan program in the long run, but so far CBO scores those loan modification costs as minimal....
Interest rate policy has huge consequences for the American middle class. Charging an above-cost rate in order to fund Pell grants for low-income students, for example, is justifiable on a theory akin to equity financing of human capital. It is a cross-subsidy from successful college grads to needy college students whose future success is uncertain. A similar case can be made for expanded subsidy and loan forgiveness programs for college graduates in low-paying but socially necessary occupations. On the other hand, the rationale to tax student loan borrowers to fund tax cuts for the wealthy, subsidies for energy and agriculture or other unrelated federal expenditures, is less clear.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Did you hear about Facebook Encouraging people to list their organ donor status?
Demeter
May 2012
#6
I have a friend: Arrow Apples. Her initials are ARO, hence the Arrow... I'm not sure how "real"
TalkingDog
May 2012
#87
Muppets 7 Twitter Accounts Goldman Sachs’ New Social Media Guru Must Follow By Sam Gustin
Demeter
May 2012
#34
Of the Countries listed, only two allow drug companies to advertise non OTC products
Po_d Mainiac
May 2012
#32
About an hour, but then I know WHERE to look which cuts down a lot of wasted time, even on the net
happyslug
May 2012
#119
THE NEXT CHAPTER GOT BETTER (NOT A "HAPPY ENDING", BECAUSE IT ISN'T OVER, OF COURSE)
Demeter
May 2012
#24
Save the Post Office: Make up for the drop in physical volume with digital services
Demeter
May 2012
#26
Thousands march on Workers’ Day in protests against cuts and labor reforms {spain}
xchrom
May 2012
#55
And then there's this: German inflation angst returns in new threat to Europe
Ghost Dog
May 2012
#66