Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists in "Perpetual Anticipation" April 13-15, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)20. Bank of America Launches Test “Mortgage to Lease” Program – Should We Be Impressed?
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/03/bank-of-america-launches-test-mortgage-to-lease-program-%E2%80%93%C2%A0should-we-be-impressed.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29
The Wall Street Journal and New York Times have reports on a pilot program at Bank of America to allow homeowners who are likely to default a graceful exit. The Charlotte bank will allow 1000 borrowers in New York, Arizona, and Nevada to turn in the deeds to their houses in return for a one year lease with a two one year renewal options at or below market rates. The program will be only with borrowers invited by the bank, which will target homeowners who are at least two months behind on payments but can demonstrate that they can pay the rent. The Journal cites an example of a Phoenix home with a $250,000 mortgage with payments of $1600 a month. It estimates the rent as $900. This is clearly a preferable alternative for homeowners to foreclosure. They escape the credit score damage, stress, and indignity of the foreclosure process and save moving costs. They are also spared the difficulty of finding a landlord who will accept a tenant with a tarnished payment record. It isnt clear how the program will handle the usual rental deposit. So whats not to like?
The devil, as always, lies in the details. Even if the program turns out to be a positive experience for borrowers and the bank, it is not clear that it is a magic bullet for the foreclosure mess. The bank is conducting the pilot on loans it owns. It appears adhere the IRS rules governing REMICs, which limit leases to two years, so the hope is that this program would be rolled out to Countrywide mortgages, which were almost always securitized. However, it is hard to imagine that balance-sheet-stressed Bank of America would include properties that had bank-owned second liens on them, since the second would be a total loss. Borrowers with second liens have much higher default rates than those with first liens only, so many borrowers in need of help are likely not to be invited to participate.
One open question is property management. Anyone who has had a bad or lazy landlord can tell you what an awful experience it is. Banks have done a terrible job of securing and maintaining foreclosed properties. How responsive will they be when a boiler fails or the roof develops a leak or a tree falls down in a storm and damages the house?A second question is the appetite of investors. Bank of America maintains it has plenty of demand from big investors, and the Obama administration is separately keen to promote bulk sales of foreclosed properties. I dont see the sort of investors being bandied about, namely private equity firms or distressed investors, being good candidates. They have high return requirements and cant manage their way out of a paper bag. And being a landlord is operationally intensive, particularly when dealing with dispersed single family homes....Im not certain the appetite for these properties lives up to the curiosity level, unless PE investors somehow have convinced themselves that the real estate market will rebound strongly on their timetable. I suspect all the hype and a few cherrypicked deals will set up dumber money, like insurance companies and public pension funds, which will go into REITs or other securitized investment vehicles. But the big issue is that these deals being done in scale and working out well depends not just on banks figuring out how to make them work to salvage borrowers, but also addressing the property management challenge.
But the real driver came at the very end of the Wall Street Journal article:
In other words, banks are so badly hoist on their own petard that they have to consider doing the right thing. But given their track record, I wouldnt bet on them pulling it off in the way the great unwashed public hopes they will.
The Wall Street Journal and New York Times have reports on a pilot program at Bank of America to allow homeowners who are likely to default a graceful exit. The Charlotte bank will allow 1000 borrowers in New York, Arizona, and Nevada to turn in the deeds to their houses in return for a one year lease with a two one year renewal options at or below market rates. The program will be only with borrowers invited by the bank, which will target homeowners who are at least two months behind on payments but can demonstrate that they can pay the rent. The Journal cites an example of a Phoenix home with a $250,000 mortgage with payments of $1600 a month. It estimates the rent as $900. This is clearly a preferable alternative for homeowners to foreclosure. They escape the credit score damage, stress, and indignity of the foreclosure process and save moving costs. They are also spared the difficulty of finding a landlord who will accept a tenant with a tarnished payment record. It isnt clear how the program will handle the usual rental deposit. So whats not to like?
The devil, as always, lies in the details. Even if the program turns out to be a positive experience for borrowers and the bank, it is not clear that it is a magic bullet for the foreclosure mess. The bank is conducting the pilot on loans it owns. It appears adhere the IRS rules governing REMICs, which limit leases to two years, so the hope is that this program would be rolled out to Countrywide mortgages, which were almost always securitized. However, it is hard to imagine that balance-sheet-stressed Bank of America would include properties that had bank-owned second liens on them, since the second would be a total loss. Borrowers with second liens have much higher default rates than those with first liens only, so many borrowers in need of help are likely not to be invited to participate.
One open question is property management. Anyone who has had a bad or lazy landlord can tell you what an awful experience it is. Banks have done a terrible job of securing and maintaining foreclosed properties. How responsive will they be when a boiler fails or the roof develops a leak or a tree falls down in a storm and damages the house?A second question is the appetite of investors. Bank of America maintains it has plenty of demand from big investors, and the Obama administration is separately keen to promote bulk sales of foreclosed properties. I dont see the sort of investors being bandied about, namely private equity firms or distressed investors, being good candidates. They have high return requirements and cant manage their way out of a paper bag. And being a landlord is operationally intensive, particularly when dealing with dispersed single family homes....Im not certain the appetite for these properties lives up to the curiosity level, unless PE investors somehow have convinced themselves that the real estate market will rebound strongly on their timetable. I suspect all the hype and a few cherrypicked deals will set up dumber money, like insurance companies and public pension funds, which will go into REITs or other securitized investment vehicles. But the big issue is that these deals being done in scale and working out well depends not just on banks figuring out how to make them work to salvage borrowers, but also addressing the property management challenge.
But the real driver came at the very end of the Wall Street Journal article:
Foreclosures have slowed sharply in some states amid heavy scrutiny of allegedly forged paperwork used by processing firms. Banks completed 860,000 foreclosures last year, down from 1.1 million in 2010, according to CoreLogic Inc.
One of the outcomes of the robo-signing scandal is that it is more difficult to foreclose, said Mr. Dean Baker. Its more worthwhile for banks to pursue alternatives.
One of the outcomes of the robo-signing scandal is that it is more difficult to foreclose, said Mr. Dean Baker. Its more worthwhile for banks to pursue alternatives.
In other words, banks are so badly hoist on their own petard that they have to consider doing the right thing. But given their track record, I wouldnt bet on them pulling it off in the way the great unwashed public hopes they will.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Lobbyist on Rep. Waters as Chair of Fin. Services Com.: “Just the name sends shivers up the spine”
Demeter
Apr 2012
#3
George Soros: Eurozone Crisis Has Entered “A Less Volatile but Potentially More Lethal Phase”
Demeter
Apr 2012
#4
Why isn’t DOJ seeking money damages in e-books price-fixing case? (COULD IT BE....CORRUPTION?)
Demeter
Apr 2012
#13
Victory in Oakland County Transfer Tax Case Paves Way for Other Michigan Suits Against Fannie and Fr
Demeter
Apr 2012
#16
Bank of America Launches Test “Mortgage to Lease” Program – Should We Be Impressed?
Demeter
Apr 2012
#20
So let's see, people paid all of the closing costs, down payments, taxes, insurance and the myriad
mbperrin
Apr 2012
#26
Foreclosure Fraud Activist Lisa Epstein Runs for Clerk of Courts in Palm Beach County
Demeter
Apr 2012
#51
The Dallas Fed Is Calling For The Immediate Breakup Of Large Banks Joe Weisenthal
Demeter
Apr 2012
#25
It’s Not a Crime to Break a Terms of Service Agreement (So It’s Okay to Never Read Them)
Demeter
Apr 2012
#36
Next Great Depression? MIT study predicting ‘global economic collapse’ by 2030 still on track
Demeter
Apr 2012
#53
4 Massive Government Bubbles; 3 Major Events That Will Burst The Bubbles (GLD, SLV, TZA, SDS, FAS)
Demeter
Apr 2012
#58
A Response To Ben Bernanke’s ‘Misunderstanding’ About The Gold Standard (GLD, SLV, IAU, SGOL)
Demeter
Apr 2012
#54
Soaring Oil price & weakening US economy-On the Edge with Max Keiser-03-23-2012
Demeter
Apr 2012
#57