Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists' 19th Nervous Breakdown April 6-8, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)50. The Coming Housing Finance Train Wreck
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/04/the-coming-housing-finance-train-wreck.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29
...If no one blinks, an ugly situation could get even worse. One the one hand, we have the complete lack of resolve on the part of the officialdom to fix the abuses in the private label securitization market, which prior to the crisis, accounted for 60% of mortgage financing. The weak risk retention rules in Dodd Frank dont cut it, and the sell side (the major banks) have been completely unwilling to consider reforms, such as those proposed by the FDIC in early 2010, that would have addressed enough of the problems to entice investors back into the pool. (The FDICs plan include one year seasoning before a loan could be sold into a securitization, 5% risk retention, loan level disclosure, and no CDOs.)
Instead, we have wishful thinking from what Matt Stoller has called the hope and change school of how we fix housing. I got a call from a very earnest financial reporter a few weeks ago, and he seemed quite convinced that covered bonds, a conservative structure with a long history in Germany, would solve the problem. Given that securitization contracts proved to be meaningless originators lied about what they were selling, trustees refused to intervene as required to do by contract in the light of clear problems with the loans (and are now trying to get their own get out of jail free cards per the example of Bank of New York in its settlement with Bank of America), and servicers scam borrower and investors it is hard to fathom would anyone with an operating brain cell have anything to do with this market. I called an investor, who confirmed my dour views: It isnt the structure that the problem, its the people behind the structure.
Private capital is on strike until better regulations are in place or memories fade, and the losses are so great that market participants say it will be a decade before there is another private securitization market in the US. This has more serious implications that you might think.
We now have a housing finance market that is almost totally on government life support. One private label was done last year. Administration officials complain that lending standards (which are a reflection of Fannie, Freddie and FHA standards) are too restrictive, as reflected in average FICO scores and down payment requirements (note Im not entirely sympathetic, borrowers should have more in the way of down payments than was the norm in the housing bubble era. As Josh Rosner has said, a home with no equity is a rental with debt). Maybe they should have been a little more supportive of tougher requirements for mortgage securitizations when Dodd Frank was being crafted...
AND THEN, THERE'S THE POLITICS...YVES HITS A HOME RUN AGAIN! MUST READ AT LINK
...If no one blinks, an ugly situation could get even worse. One the one hand, we have the complete lack of resolve on the part of the officialdom to fix the abuses in the private label securitization market, which prior to the crisis, accounted for 60% of mortgage financing. The weak risk retention rules in Dodd Frank dont cut it, and the sell side (the major banks) have been completely unwilling to consider reforms, such as those proposed by the FDIC in early 2010, that would have addressed enough of the problems to entice investors back into the pool. (The FDICs plan include one year seasoning before a loan could be sold into a securitization, 5% risk retention, loan level disclosure, and no CDOs.)
Instead, we have wishful thinking from what Matt Stoller has called the hope and change school of how we fix housing. I got a call from a very earnest financial reporter a few weeks ago, and he seemed quite convinced that covered bonds, a conservative structure with a long history in Germany, would solve the problem. Given that securitization contracts proved to be meaningless originators lied about what they were selling, trustees refused to intervene as required to do by contract in the light of clear problems with the loans (and are now trying to get their own get out of jail free cards per the example of Bank of New York in its settlement with Bank of America), and servicers scam borrower and investors it is hard to fathom would anyone with an operating brain cell have anything to do with this market. I called an investor, who confirmed my dour views: It isnt the structure that the problem, its the people behind the structure.
Private capital is on strike until better regulations are in place or memories fade, and the losses are so great that market participants say it will be a decade before there is another private securitization market in the US. This has more serious implications that you might think.
We now have a housing finance market that is almost totally on government life support. One private label was done last year. Administration officials complain that lending standards (which are a reflection of Fannie, Freddie and FHA standards) are too restrictive, as reflected in average FICO scores and down payment requirements (note Im not entirely sympathetic, borrowers should have more in the way of down payments than was the norm in the housing bubble era. As Josh Rosner has said, a home with no equity is a rental with debt). Maybe they should have been a little more supportive of tougher requirements for mortgage securitizations when Dodd Frank was being crafted...
AND THEN, THERE'S THE POLITICS...YVES HITS A HOME RUN AGAIN! MUST READ AT LINK
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Exactly. Bankruptcy is one of only two individual rights specifically addressed in the
Egalitarian Thug
Apr 2012
#79
What's all the fuzz about money? (THEY MEANT TO SAY: "FUSS") A MUST-READ ARTICLE!
Demeter
Apr 2012
#21
Here are 10 things you may have missed this week that are worth noting...OR NOT
Demeter
Apr 2012
#23