Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

In reply to the discussion: Was this really necessary? [View all]

libodem

(19,288 posts)
24. "They know it when they see it"
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:52 PM
Apr 2013

As far as the SC judges were concerned about what constituted smut, too nasty to see. Apparently some judges consumed a ton of it in chambers. There is a word for it that I can't think of, but it means the perverse stuff. Maybe it was, pornography?

I hope you don't get trolled, and hidden for your "cs" reference. It was discussed in Meta as having no other greater meaning, than to be a homosexual slur. Profound Revelation. Be prepared. Sorry.

Was this really necessary? [View all] theKed Apr 2013 OP
I agree with you... nebenaube Apr 2013 #1
HoF is a protected group and they can run it any way they want. rrneck Apr 2013 #2
agreed. their echo chamber is their right. galileoreloaded May 2013 #91
It's a purge. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #3
Nothing wild there. Just SOP ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2013 #4
i like sigmasix. he is a thinker. i can always appreciate that in agreement or not. nt seabeyond Apr 2013 #5
Do you theKed Apr 2013 #6
i did not read it. nt seabeyond Apr 2013 #8
It's quoted above theKed Apr 2013 #9
I don't want to continue this debate, because it has no bearing on the article in question seabeyond Apr 2013 #12
DRIVE BY! snooper2 Apr 2013 #18
shake it out, shake it out seabeyond Apr 2013 #19
me too, I said one damn thing and was immediately blocked quinnox Apr 2013 #7
C'mon guys. That was the purpose of the thread. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #11
Me too. Soundman Apr 2013 #45
Welcome to the club Major Nikon Apr 2013 #10
If I had known my membership card to the club theKed Apr 2013 #13
Hey Warren D got blocked from there without ever making a post ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2013 #14
How about a free video? Major Nikon Apr 2013 #17
I've been blocked from a group libodem Apr 2013 #15
Don't let it get you down! Vinnie From Indy Apr 2013 #20
The women do seem to have a very conservative bent libodem Apr 2013 #25
Free throught and free speech are always pretty Buffalo Bull Apr 2013 #21
"They know it when they see it" libodem Apr 2013 #24
Free speech is primary; thank you for the warning Buffalo Bull Apr 2013 #36
Agree libodem Apr 2013 #38
I have made an official complaint against this group, History of Feminism, in ask the admins forum quinnox Apr 2013 #16
And, of course, polmaven Apr 2013 #22
nope, didn't say that quinnox Apr 2013 #23
I admire your gumption libodem Apr 2013 #26
no problem quinnox Apr 2013 #27
I think he must know libodem Apr 2013 #28
I think he does know quinnox Apr 2013 #29
They seem to represent the Phyllis Schaffly faction libodem Apr 2013 #30
But if you criticize that, you're criticizing all of "Feminism" Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #31
Good graphic libodem Apr 2013 #33
I had one yesterday where someone was following a DU member around throwing a quote from one of Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #34
It's not sudden LadyHawkAZ Apr 2013 #42
Precisely how? LanternWaste Apr 2013 #89
I think if you want to reply to a post that contains the words "lately" Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #90
The new rules on limiting alerts seems to have many of them spun up Major Nikon Apr 2013 #43
I was under the impression.. Upton Apr 2013 #46
I thought so too ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2013 #48
Tied for 2nd most in last 90 days it seems Major Nikon Apr 2013 #51
Oh, but that's because.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2013 #54
Evidently Major Nikon Apr 2013 #50
Surprisingly enough, the "examples" of "sexism and misogyny" mostly seem to be, instead, Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #52
There's a difference? Major Nikon Apr 2013 #53
Ahh... but you see, apparently the sock thing was all an innocent misunderstanding.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #60
It's their group, they can run it how they want. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #32
OMG libodem Apr 2013 #35
Her "research" and groups affiliated with her have been repeatedly promoted on DU Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #37
yuck libodem Apr 2013 #39
It does get very wearying. HappyMe Apr 2013 #40
Thank you libodem Apr 2013 #41
I don't think they have that much credibility. HappyMe Apr 2013 #44
Driving people away libodem Apr 2013 #47
They are not the new voice of feminism ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2013 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Apr 2013 #55
Most of us do that. For instance, I am a staunch supporter of choice, reproductive freedom, equality Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #68
Okay, where's my cookie? I want my cookie! Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #69
Also, for the record, this was NOT me. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #70
They're migrating west. name not needed Apr 2013 #81
And his name is ACTUALLY "Adam Sandler" Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #82
And also.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #71
Yeah, I'm supposed to be one even though I'd never heard the term until people complained about it. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #73
It's exactly like... opiate69 Apr 2013 #74
just not all at once. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #75
lol.. no shit.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #76
What a cool pad! Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #77
heh.. Steven Tyler better hope so opiate69 Apr 2013 #78
Fine, then... I'll see you Steven Tyler's house Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #79
For some reason... and I mean, I know they made BRAZILLIONS... opiate69 Apr 2013 #80
I remember a story in the early 80s about someone's friend who was a very blissed out Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #83
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Apr 2013 #84
Couple things. One, Gary Johnson is pretty different from Ed Meese. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #85
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Apr 2013 #86
Exactly. But logical fallacies abound on DU, particularly in certain corners. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #87
and the corollary... Buffalo Bull Apr 2013 #88
Meta was awash with it too. Gore1FL Apr 2013 #64
It floated over the top of the bowl libodem Apr 2013 #65
Just to maybe head off some of the accusations against you, opiate69 Apr 2013 #57
It is their space, it should be respected Buffalo Bull Apr 2013 #62
but in our space... beating the dead horse Buffalo Bull Apr 2013 #66
Necessary? Of course not. Wholly and pathetically predictable? opiate69 Apr 2013 #56
Oh, it doesn't really matter that you weren't looking for a fight... ElboRuum Apr 2013 #58
I'm still burning a little over a thread I started... TreasonousBastard Apr 2013 #59
I think the gender reference libodem Apr 2013 #61
The OP is talking shit about HoF. You posted that in Feminism. redqueen Apr 2013 #67
You're right... TreasonousBastard Apr 2013 #72
I have answer for a question you asked Gore1FL Apr 2013 #63
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Was this really necessary...»Reply #24