Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: No Job? No Date for You! [View all]Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)Objects can't have babies.
The term "sex object" is an oxymoron. Objects don't have gender or coitus. So literally "objectification" makes no literal sense. Conceptually it makes even less sense. It literally assumes that men prefer to have sex with objects rather than humans and it completely denies that sexual attraction is part and parcel to humanity. It's nothing more than a meaningless word created to serve the purposes of misandry. The term "self-objectification" is actually misogynist because it portrays women who want to be desired for their appearance as somehow inferior. Many don't realize that the rad-fem agenda is actually very misogynistic. They don't do it so much anymore because so many other feminists called them out for it, but rad-fems used to demonize women who chose to be stay at home moms as tools of the patriarchy.