Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
So we can have JohnRebel Jan 2013 #1
What's wrong with letting the people, not corporations, choose? Kennah Jan 2013 #3
Absolute non sequitur ... Trajan Jan 2013 #19
Appears to be legit Kennah Jan 2013 #2
I would prefer ONE 6-year term. RoverSuswade Jan 2013 #4
Or even one 8 year term. defacto7 Jan 2013 #6
^ THAT! + A Million. It should be the same length of time as a Senator. nt cecilfirefox Jan 2013 #10
It is real. See links below Tx4obama Jan 2013 #5
So this proposal defacto7 Jan 2013 #7
See comment #12. He reintroduced it because it expired at the end of the last session. n/t Tx4obama Jan 2013 #13
I am for it. The constitution did NOT allow for limits until the repubs for political reason did it graham4anything Jan 2013 #8
I wonder why he thought that it was important to introduce this proposed amendment. xxxsdesdexxx Jan 2013 #9
If we can get rid of the corrupt voting machines and make sure our vote-counting system is accurate NBachers Jan 2013 #11
It is the old H.J.Res.17 resolution from the last congressional session it just has a new name... Tx4obama Jan 2013 #12
I guess that's why it seems to have come from nowhere. defacto7 Jan 2013 #16
Thanks NT Howzit Jan 2013 #17
Apparently Serrano has introduced this every 2 years since 1997, see... PoliticAverse Jan 2013 #14
He has submitted this resolution to EVERY congressional session since 1997 Tx4obama Jan 2013 #15
I'm all for it, let the people decide putitinD Jan 2013 #18
How about no? Undismayed Jan 2013 #20
The argument for no term limit on the prez is simple: FDR, New Deal! Peace Patriot Jan 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»Amendment proposed to rep...»Reply #9