HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Places » U.S. » Pennsylvania (Group) » Federal Judge Halts Attem... » Reply #4

Response to JPZenger (Original post)

Wed Aug 28, 2013, 03:07 PM

4. I think it's even more clear than just "industrial or commercial users of any kind"

 

Read the article and PDF from here (no registration required): http://preservationlawdigest.com/2012/03/08/stockport-mountain-corporation-llc-v-norcross-wildlife-foundation/

Not only does the easement say no "industrial or commercial uses of any kind," in the paragraph right after that in Section 4) Prohibited Uses it clearly states "d) Commercial mining and/or quarrying of any kind." Isn't fracking "mining" of a sort?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
JPZenger Aug 2013 OP
elleng Aug 2013 #1
Ednahilda Aug 2013 #2
Champion Jack Aug 2013 #3
LineNew Reply I think it's even more clear than just "industrial or commercial users of any kind"
dballance Aug 2013 #4
JPZenger Aug 2013 #5
Please login to view edit histories.