Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
In reply to the discussion: Can we admit at long last that Tim Burton's Batman sucks and always did? [View all]HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)21. Well, Kilmer was convincing, but the Clooney one DEFINITELY sucked.
The only thing that saved Clooney was The Aaaahhnold. He played a very convincing Mr. Freeze. Danny DeVito did a good Penguin too - and I don't think anyone could top Jim Carrey as The Riddler. Alfred was good too.
The Nolan works are far more realistic than they are comic bookish. They're definitely better movies on all counts. I like Burton's work, but it works better for things that do not have to have a shred of reality involved - "Nightmare Before Christmas", "Corpse Bride", etc.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Can we admit at long last that Tim Burton's Batman sucks and always did? [View all]
Orrex
Nov 2012
OP
As a long-time (ca. 1957) "World's Finest" comic version fan, I think the emphasis on "dark"
WinkyDink
Nov 2012
#5
I really disagree- I like films where the character seem real and relatable,
cecilfirefox
Nov 2012
#20
Hehheh. I stopped reading comics before I turned thirty. :-) Now I just collect the old ones.
WinkyDink
Nov 2012
#27
Surely you're not describing Burton's film as "operatic, eminently quotable, & gorgeous to look at?"
Orrex
Nov 2012
#18
Only after you admit that you were on a bad trip when you came up with this idea
dr.strangelove
Nov 2012
#33