DAYAM did anybody else see this this weekend?

[GatorLarry]

15. I agree, but . . .

not completely, dkf.

I see the upper 2% -- specifically including Wall Street -- as having profited enormously over the last 10-years or so. They got a head-start, so to speak.

The middle class has already made a "contribution" to the Top 2% tax cuts and the unfunded wars of aggression, outsourced (lost) jobs while the CEOs got huge bonuse$ and have lost their net worth (their home equity lessened, if they still even have their homes).

I say we start right now hitting the ultra-rich just half as hard as the middle class has taken it these last 10-years.

If some want to call that "socialism" then let 'em. They've tried every other code name to denigrate non-republicans: liberals, bleeding-hearts, communists, etc.

But in the future, I do agree that all new spending should either be truly and honestly revenue-neutral or should have an accompanying tax increase or specific spending cut to pay for it.