Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Bette Noir

(3,581 posts)

3. What "neck and neck"?

Reply to Segami (Original post)

Sat Dec 1, 2012, 10:42 AM

Dec 2012

The only polls that had Romney even close to O were Rasmussen and Gallup, which were clearly biased. The 9% chance Nate gave Romney of winning at the end was based on the off chance that Rasmussen and Gallup were right. There were not.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nate Silver TAKES A SHOT At Politico [View all] Segami Dec 2012 OP

you heaven05 Dec 2012 #1

that's the thing about that kool-aid byers was drinking SemperEadem Dec 2012 #2

What "neck and neck"? Bette Noir Dec 2012 #3

Politico, Chris Cillizza, et al., had a fundamental lack of understanding of the electoral college spooky3 Dec 2012 #4

Bravo Nate! SoapBox Dec 2012 #5

Mitt's Pollsters were unable to measure the 47%! bucolic_frolic Dec 2012 #6

Greed Apache Crew Chief 65 Dec 2012 #7