Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: An Airplane Ran Out of Fuel at 41,000 Feet. Here's What Happened Next [View all]The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,679 posts)18. You can't visually inspect the fuel tanks on a big jet. You have to rely on the numbers supplied
Last edited Sat Mar 9, 2019, 06:57 PM - Edit history (1)
when the ground crew fuels the airplane. (There are what's called dripless sticks which give you at least a WAG) There's a before and after gauge on the fuel truck, and those numbers are given to the crew and to dispatch for weight purposes as well as required fuel, but the fuel guys supplied the load in pounds rather than kilograms and the flight crew didn't catch the error.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
An Airplane Ran Out of Fuel at 41,000 Feet. Here's What Happened Next [View all]
yortsed snacilbuper
Mar 2019
OP
How many others would have tried to stretch it and ended up maybe short and in a building.
Hassin Bin Sober
Mar 2019
#38
What sort of a pilot does not know how much fuel there is... where was ground maint?
NotHardly
Mar 2019
#9
There was a lot of confusion by a lot of people about a lot of things in that accident.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2019
#43
You can't visually inspect the fuel tanks on a big jet. You have to rely on the numbers supplied
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2019
#18
In a small GA aircraft, the fuel gauges aren't much more sophisticated than a toilet bowl float.
Major Nikon
Mar 2019
#34
A 747 has a glide ratio of 14:1, much better than a C-172. You wouldn't think so, but
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2019
#44
Here's a similar incident which occurred over the mid-Atlantic in 2001.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Mar 2019
#33
I remember reading about this and that he was lucky the front landing gear did no lock into place or
cstanleytech
Mar 2019
#39