Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Thomas Frank: Why Clinton attacks Sanders in new Book [View all]bettyellen
(47,209 posts)138. the past 18 months have been an eye opener. So many people completely unaware of their sexist crap.
Really disappointing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
152 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Precisely, one only needs to know who the person is to know the way the video is going to go.
George II
Sep 2017
#13
Why would I even consider refuting what someone I'm not interested in has to say?
George II
Sep 2017
#72
He says "Dems have occupied the WH 16 of the last 24 years" instead of repugs have...
brush
Sep 2017
#92
It's far easier snipe at and use a "corrupt" established party than to do the work of building
ehrnst
Sep 2017
#66
Yep, they don't want to do that work. They prefer a hostile takeover instead of having...
brush
Sep 2017
#94
Getting 3 minutes and 58 seconds into it would have certainly confirmed your belief.
Amimnoch
Sep 2017
#28
In both 2008 and 2016 Hillary Clinton was treated as Bill Clinton's wife running for president.
StevieM
Sep 2017
#50
Bernie is Everyman-progressive; Hillary is political-elite-neoliberal. That's why.
Magoo48
Sep 2017
#14
Seems to be he has a big problem w Bill Clinton, beyond that Hillary's not gracious enough.
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#85
Then why did he cherry pick this: He says, "Dems have occupied the WH 16 of the last 24 yrs" instea
brush
Sep 2017
#95
It was great for men- the white ones. Only by extension to their wives and kids though.
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#35
It was built on women and POC being exploited for grossly underpaid and or free labor....
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#53
You realize Obama was punished in the midterms for pushing through heathcare- higher taxes
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#63
It seems like the Scandanvian model of social democracy is being challenged by diversity...
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#75
Yeah, there's no sexism, racism, xenophobia there. All that affordable health care and wage equity
ehrnst
Sep 2017
#89
You don't seem to understand that women and POC were left behind by the new deal- it widened the
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#65
It was good for 1930s America. We have no idea of how it would be for 2010s America.
George II
Sep 2017
#116
The so called progressives who wanted to get rid of pelosi got behind that type of democrat
JI7
Sep 2017
#144
Oh, please: claims that anyone who doesn't love the former Speaker or nominee is sexist is pathetic
Chasstev365
Sep 2017
#145
You are absolutely correct that many voted against Hillary because she is a woman
Chasstev365
Sep 2017
#147
"You can't blame her for her husbands deeds BUT...." and she's not gracious enough, LOL.
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#47
100%. It is an excellent history & outline of the current challenges/factions dividing our Party.
stuffmatters
Sep 2017
#83
Interesting he wouldn't notice his own gratuitous comments on her congeniality...
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#113
the past 18 months have been an eye opener. So many people completely unaware of their sexist crap.
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#138
Wrong, the Clinton philosophy was NOT breaking the Democrats away from the New Deal
Eliot Rosewater
Sep 2017
#78
Yep. All the Republicans would have to say to defeat a Bernie/Frank agenda is say this
Yavin4
Sep 2017
#96
We need to not be intimidated by ignorance and hatred and stay and defend New Deal democracy
LiberalLovinLug
Sep 2017
#136