Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
14. Thanks, A/V. It means Christians should abstain until they want to have a baby, too.
Wed May 16, 2012, 10:15 AM
May 2012

This explains their anti-contraception position, got to be productive all the time, or celibate. I get it.

But by reducing human sexuality to mere livestock, the end result is a brute existance or slavery. The abundance of their numbers most likely to end in a huge barbeque, in a war not of their choosing.

For whose benefit shall men and women's bodies be reduced to one prescribed purpose in life?

That is the question that all should ask of those who are seeking to sell us something. Never stop learning more.

If these guys have so much energy for their one version of pleasing God, they should to apply it by reading the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5-7.

There is no mention of 'teh gay' there, but those verses define their actions next to those of Obama. That would end half their foolishness attacking others and him.

Marriage equality is not a religious question. Those who are asking to recieve the same benefits as others in society are not coming at this from religion, but equality granted under a secular state for what they put into it.

The same ones wrapping their Bibles in the American flag need to realize the Constitution and their book are not the same things and never will be. You can have a republic with only limited authority in people's personal lives or you can have an overwhelming and oppressive theocracy.

To have what the religious right is selling, Mussolini's brand of religious fascism, you will have to give up both the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The leaders of the movement know this, but their followers are childish and don't see what they really are, wolves in sheep's clothing.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Pat Robertson responds to...»Reply #14