Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
A perception problem? A PERCEPTION PROBLEM?!? annabanana Apr 2012 #1
Itīs just fascinating isnīt it? Lars77 Apr 2012 #2
The Koch brothers might buy it push those nasty protestors away... freshwest Apr 2012 #3
Yep, that's all it is. Now shut up and go home, folks. Or else. freshwest Apr 2012 #4
Calls to mind the adage customerserviceguy Apr 2012 #7
Love the way this guy parses words, getting technical. First they start by experimenting on people freshwest Apr 2012 #5
IIRC, they had this toy in Afghanistan. unhappycamper Apr 2012 #6
Pain compliance on American citizens gets go ahead by court: freshwest Apr 2012 #8
That case is so messed up. cstanleytech Apr 2012 #11
If any human ever perceives a "pain ray", that's a problem of perception saras Apr 2012 #9
This thing violates the human rights to free association, free speech and free assembly. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #10
How can a device not in use violate those rights? Show me where it says it in the constitution that. cstanleytech Apr 2012 #12
This device is intended for crowd control use. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #13
Would you be more supportive if it was restricted to crowds that are resorting to violence though cstanleytech Apr 2012 #14
What would a drone do to a crowd throwing stones or Molotov cocktails? JDPriestly Apr 2012 #15
I thought the discussion was about the heat ray device to disperse crowds? If not cstanleytech Apr 2012 #17
The heat ray device could be used from inside a building to prevent people from coming in the window JDPriestly Apr 2012 #18
headline of the day Enrique Apr 2012 #16
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»US military fights negati...»Reply #4