Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Showing Original Post only (View all)Spider-Woman's Big Ass is a Big Deal! [View all]
This is a video about the controversy surrounding the new spider woman comic cover. I think the topic has more to do with women's issues and the portrayal of women in entertainment than just it being a showbiz commentary.
So if the mods considers it to be just showbiz, then give me a heads up and I will take it down myself. No need to alert this post
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
263 replies, 35135 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (32)
ReplyReply to this post
263 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It is not the same pose. Spiderwoman's ass is featured WAY more prominently and much higher.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#8
You can have a sexy, muscular Spiderwoman superhero without portraying women in a degrading manner.
Veilex
Sep 2014
#81
Nope. In none of those is he swaybacked and his butt turned up, anus exposed.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#228
So you think this artwork is "sexist bigoted crap" but you have no problem with other spiderman art?
Veilex
Sep 2014
#75
And since we're looking into the definition of the two words, let me google that for you:
Veilex
Sep 2014
#84
I'm not telling anyone what they should find sexy. I am just pointing out sexism.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#93
Nope, Spiderwoman does not "equal sexism." But the Milo Manara version is sexist.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#100
"It's pretty sad to see so-called adults arguing over such ridiculous things"
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#133
I don't expect a superhero to look normal. But why can't she look strong like Spiderman?
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#187
Of course. And am I not allowed to comment when that expression is offensive? nt
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#159
Calling that the "exact same pose" as the person in the OP video does is inaccurate.
Gormy Cuss
Sep 2014
#7
No one is regulating positions. We're just objecting to the degrading depiction.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#168
I am not ignoring anything. The Spiderman pose is not same nor similar to the Spiderwoman pose.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#87
Please cite a post in this thread that shows Spiderman drawn in a sexist way. nt
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#119
The interesting thing here is that our culture, thanks largely to the catholic church...
Veilex
Sep 2014
#74
No, she's supposed to crawl up the side of the building the same way Spiderman does.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#28
oy I don't get all the controversy over a comic book cover if folks want to get upset
azurnoir
Sep 2014
#20
More shocking is that supposedly progressive DUers don't see what is wrong with that cover.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#24
This isn't about slut shaming a cartoon woman, it's about how a cartoonist portrays women.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#37
"Sexual attractiveness" is not the objection. It's the degrading, powerless pose of Spiderwoman.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#137
Try doing anything with your head down, swaybacked, with butt cheeks spread open.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#145
The pose is degrading. You have a misogynistic view of what is "natural" for women.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#148
You have yet to show a Spiderman pose in a Spiderman comic that warrants rebuke. nt
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#97
Feminists do not "have a problem with anything that is female that arouses straight men."
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#65
You think explicit depictions of sexuality or nudity indicate perversion?
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#126
So leaving aside a subjective disagreement on interpretation which is probably pointless to argue,
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#155
Why are you not more concerned with the impacts of degrading female images on 13 year olds?
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#157
"the impacts of degrading female images on 13 year olds" - let's, shall we say, "unpack" that.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#167
As far as I'm concerned, there is at least one totally meaningless concept in your post.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#174
If this was a racist cover, no one would be saying no kids would be "impacted."
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#176
And if it was a triple decker ice cream sundae, it would need to be eaten, or it would melt.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#179
It's nothing like racism because it's women being degraded. Who cares, amiright?
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#180
My daughter would have to be a cartoon superhero. However, that cartoon superhero appears to be an
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#193
I suppose Marvel will make money off this, with folks like you buying their porn comics.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#199
You sure make a big fuss defending something you "don't give two shits for." nt
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#209
I'm defending the idea that the picture of spiderwoman's butt is not, actually, that big of a deal
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#211
You're defending selling a comic with a degrading rear penetration porn shot on the cover to kids.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#214
Again, there's no point in trying to argue over subjective interpretation, but you're wrong.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#221
Oh, right, I called you "Nostradamus", which is a well-known abusive insult. After, of course, you
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#223
Yes, it was mocking name-calling. After you asked, repeatedly, that I make a prediction.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#226
Right. You insist on making it personal because you seemingly can't deal with the fact
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#229
You obviously have plenty of time to keep badgering me with long-winded pointless posts. nt
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#232
Yes, let's give Marvel an award for profiting off selling woman-degrading porn to 13-year-olds.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#136
So--- which Presidential candidate in recent years was responsible for this quote:
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#256
Even better than those Drain-o ads that had "One Million Moms" so upset.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#156
The big deal is that people don't think it's a big deal, which PROVES it's a big deal.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#198